tablet: be more expensive than capsules

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents electronic device
Weight: 0.67
, personal computer
Weight: 0.67
, mobile phone
Weight: 0.64
, device
Weight: 0.64
, market
Weight: 0.64
Siblings nokia
Weight: 0.60
, nook
Weight: 0.55
, playbook
Weight: 0.51
, tablet computer
Weight: 0.41
, smartphone
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more expensive than capsules 1.00
be better than capsules 0.97
be in capsules 0.94
be more expensive than tablets 0.84
cost more than tablets 0.82
be better than tablets 0.79
get more expensive 0.78
be more expensive than than tv 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be more expensive than capsules) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, be more expensive than tablets)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be more expensive than capsules) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, cost more than tablets)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be more expensive than capsules) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, get more expensive)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be more expensive than capsules) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, be better than tablets)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(tablet, be more expensive than capsules) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(smartphone, cost more than tablets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(smartphone, cost more than tablets)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(tablet, be more expensive than capsules) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(smartphone, be better than tablets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(smartphone, be better than tablets)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(tablet, be more expensive than capsules) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(smartphone, be more expensive than tablets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(smartphone, be more expensive than tablets)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(tablet, be more expensive than capsules) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(smartphone, get more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(smartphone, get more expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(tablet, be more expensive than capsules) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(tablet, be more expensive than capsules)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(tablet, be more expensive than capsules) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be in capsules)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(tablet, be more expensive than capsules) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(tablet, be in capsules)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(tablet, be more expensive than capsules) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(tablet, be in capsules)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(tablet, be more expensive than capsules) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(tablet, be better than capsules)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(tablet, be more expensive than capsules) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be better than capsules)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(tablet, be more expensive than capsules) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(tablet, be better than capsules)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(tablet, be more expensive than capsules) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(tablet, be in capsules)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(tablet, be more expensive than capsules) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(tablet, be better than capsules)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(tablet, be more expensive than capsules) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(tablet, be more expensive than capsules) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be more expensive than capsules)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(tablet, be more expensive than capsules) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(tablet, be more expensive than capsules)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be more expensive than capsules) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(smartphone, be more expensive than tablets)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be more expensive than capsules) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(smartphone, cost more than tablets)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be more expensive than capsules) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(smartphone, be better than tablets)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be more expensive than capsules) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(smartphone, get more expensive)