taco bell: be better than mcdonalds

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.74
, restaurant
Weight: 0.73
, fast food chain
Weight: 0.72
, mexican food
Weight: 0.70
, food chain
Weight: 0.70
Siblings taco
Weight: 0.38
, burrito
Weight: 0.37
, tamale
Weight: 0.37
, mexican restaurant
Weight: 0.37
, italian restaurant
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than mcdonalds 1.00
be better than chinese food 0.85
be much more expensive in nyc 0.84
be better than food 0.83
be different from american food 0.76
is good yahoo 0.76
is nyc 0.76
be cheap in toronto 0.76
think i m greifer 0.75
ever serve pepsi 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(restaurant, is nyc)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(taco bell, be better than mcdonalds)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(restaurant, be much more expensive in nyc)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(taco bell, be better than mcdonalds)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(mexican food, be better than chinese food)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(taco bell, be better than mcdonalds)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(mexican food, be better than food)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(taco bell, be better than mcdonalds)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(restaurant, be cheap in toronto)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(taco bell, be better than mcdonalds)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(mexican food, be different from american food)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(taco bell, be better than mcdonalds)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(mexican food, is good yahoo)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(taco bell, be better than mcdonalds)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(taco bell, be better than mcdonalds)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(mexican food, is good yahoo)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(taco bell, be better than mcdonalds)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(mexican food, be different from american food)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(taco bell, be better than mcdonalds)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(mexican food, be better than food)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(taco bell, be better than mcdonalds)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(mexican food, be better than chinese food)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(taco bell, be better than mcdonalds)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be cheap in toronto)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(taco bell, be better than mcdonalds)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be much more expensive in nyc)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(taco bell, be better than mcdonalds)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(restaurant, is nyc)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(taco bell, be better than mcdonalds)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be much more expensive in nyc)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(taco bell, be better than mcdonalds)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(mexican food, is good yahoo)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(taco bell, be better than mcdonalds)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(mexican food, be better than chinese food)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(taco bell, be better than mcdonalds)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be cheap in toronto)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(taco bell, be better than mcdonalds)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(mexican food, be different from american food)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(taco bell, be better than mcdonalds)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, is nyc)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(taco bell, be better than mcdonalds)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(mexican food, be better than food)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(taco bell, be better than mcdonalds)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(taco, think i m greifer)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(restaurant, be much more expensive in nyc)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(taco bell, be better than mcdonalds)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(taco bell, be better than mcdonalds)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(restaurant, is nyc)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(taco bell, be better than mcdonalds)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(taco bell, be better than mcdonalds)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(mexican food, be better than chinese food)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(taco bell, be better than mcdonalds)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(taco bell, be better than mcdonalds)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(mexican food, be better than food)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(taco bell, be better than mcdonalds)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(taco bell, be better than mcdonalds)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(restaurant, be cheap in toronto)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(taco bell, be better than mcdonalds)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(taco bell, be better than mcdonalds)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(mexican food, be different from american food)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(taco bell, be better than mcdonalds)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(taco bell, be better than mcdonalds)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(mexican food, is good yahoo)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(taco bell, be better than mcdonalds)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(taco bell, be better than mcdonalds)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(taco bell, be better than mcdonalds)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(taco, think i m greifer)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(taco, think i m greifer)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(taco bell, be better than mcdonalds)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(taco bell, be better than mcdonalds)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(taco bell, be better than mcdonalds)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(taco bell, be better than mcdonalds)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(taco bell, be better than mcdonalds)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(taco bell, be better than mcdonalds)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(taco bell, be better than mcdonalds)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(taco bell, be better than mcdonalds)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(mexican food, be better than food)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(taco bell, be better than mcdonalds)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(mexican food, be better than chinese food)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(taco bell, be better than mcdonalds)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(mexican food, be different from american food)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(taco bell, be better than mcdonalds)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(mexican food, is good yahoo)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(taco bell, be better than mcdonalds)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(restaurant, be much more expensive in nyc)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(taco bell, be better than mcdonalds)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(restaurant, be cheap in toronto)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(taco bell, be better than mcdonalds)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(restaurant, is nyc)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(taco bell, be better than mcdonalds)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(taco, think i m greifer)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(taco bell, be better than mcdonalds)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(mexican food, be better than food)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(taco bell, be better than mcdonalds)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(mexican food, be better than chinese food)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(taco bell, be better than mcdonalds)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(mexican food, be different from american food)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(taco bell, be better than mcdonalds)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(mexican food, is good yahoo)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(taco bell, be better than mcdonalds)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(restaurant, be cheap in toronto)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(taco bell, be better than mcdonalds)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(restaurant, be much more expensive in nyc)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(taco bell, be better than mcdonalds)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(restaurant, is nyc)