taco bell: be called bell

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.74
, restaurant
Weight: 0.73
, fast food chain
Weight: 0.72
, mexican food
Weight: 0.70
, food chain
Weight: 0.70
Siblings taco
Weight: 0.38
, burrito
Weight: 0.37
, tamale
Weight: 0.37
, mexican restaurant
Weight: 0.37
, italian restaurant
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be called bell 1.00
have bell 0.98
is bell good 0.97
be named bell 0.95
has shape bell 0.93
is bell fucking good 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(taco bell, be called bell) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(taco, is bell good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(taco bell, be called bell) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(taco, has shape bell)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(taco bell, be called bell) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(taco, is bell fucking good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(taco bell, be called bell) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(taco, has shape bell) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(taco, has shape bell)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(taco bell, be called bell) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(taco, is bell fucking good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(taco, is bell fucking good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(taco bell, be called bell) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(taco, is bell good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(taco, is bell good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(taco bell, be called bell) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(taco bell, be called bell)

Similarity expansion

0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(taco bell, be called bell) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(taco bell, have bell)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(taco bell, be called bell) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(taco bell, be named bell)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(taco bell, be called bell) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(taco bell, have bell)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(taco bell, be called bell) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(taco bell, be named bell)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(taco bell, be called bell) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(taco bell, have bell)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(taco bell, be called bell) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(taco bell, be named bell)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(taco bell, be called bell) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(taco bell, have bell)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(taco bell, be called bell) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(taco bell, be named bell)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(taco bell, be called bell) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(taco bell, be called bell) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(taco bell, be called bell)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(taco bell, be called bell) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(taco bell, be called bell)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(taco bell, be called bell) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(taco, has shape bell)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(taco bell, be called bell) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(taco, is bell fucking good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(taco bell, be called bell) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(taco, is bell good)