taco bell: is closed

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.74
, restaurant
Weight: 0.73
, fast food chain
Weight: 0.72
, mexican food
Weight: 0.70
, food chain
Weight: 0.70
Siblings taco
Weight: 0.38
, burrito
Weight: 0.37
, tamale
Weight: 0.37
, mexican restaurant
Weight: 0.37
, italian restaurant
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
is closed 1.00
be closed today 0.96
be closed on tuesdays 0.91
be closed on wednesdays 0.90
be closed in afternoon 0.88
is closed mondays 0.88
closed on mondays 0.87
be closed on mondays 0.87
be closed on monday 0.84
closed on monday 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(restaurant, be closed on mondays)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(taco bell, is closed)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(restaurant, be closed on monday)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(taco bell, is closed)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(taco bell, is closed)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be closed on mondays)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(taco bell, is closed)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be closed on monday)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(taco bell, is closed)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be closed on mondays)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(taco bell, is closed)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be closed on monday)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(taco bell, is closed)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, is closed mondays)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(taco bell, is closed)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, closed on mondays)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(taco bell, is closed)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be closed on mondays)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(taco bell, is closed)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be closed on mondays)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(restaurant, be closed on mondays)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(taco bell, is closed)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(taco bell, is closed)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(restaurant, be closed on monday)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(taco bell, is closed)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(taco bell, is closed)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(taco bell, is closed)
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(italian restaurant, is closed mondays)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(italian restaurant, is closed mondays)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(taco bell, is closed)
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(italian restaurant, be closed on mondays)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(italian restaurant, be closed on mondays)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(taco bell, is closed)
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(italian restaurant, closed on mondays)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(italian restaurant, closed on mondays)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(taco bell, is closed)
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be closed on mondays)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(mexican restaurant, be closed on mondays)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(taco bell, is closed)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(taco bell, is closed)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(taco bell, is closed)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(taco bell, be closed today)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(taco bell, is closed)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(taco bell, be closed today)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(taco bell, is closed)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(taco bell, be closed today)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(taco bell, is closed)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(taco bell, be closed today)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(taco bell, is closed)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(taco bell, is closed)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(taco bell, is closed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(taco bell, is closed)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(taco bell, is closed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(taco bell, is closed)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(restaurant, be closed on mondays)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(taco bell, is closed)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(restaurant, be closed on monday)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(taco bell, is closed)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, is closed mondays)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(taco bell, is closed)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, closed on mondays)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(taco bell, is closed)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, be closed on mondays)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(taco bell, is closed)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(mexican restaurant, be closed on mondays)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(taco bell, is closed)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(restaurant, be closed on mondays)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(taco bell, is closed)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(restaurant, be closed on monday)