talc: be in makeup bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents material
Weight: 0.63
, substance
Weight: 0.62
, powder
Weight: 0.59
, filler
Weight: 0.57
, ingredient
Weight: 0.57
Siblings cobalt
Weight: 0.35
, titanium dioxide
Weight: 0.35
, magnesium oxide
Weight: 0.35
, silica
Weight: 0.35
, sulfuric acid
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in makeup bad 1.00
be in makeup 0.97
be used in makeup 0.95
be bad for skin 0.78
be bad in eyeshadow 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(talc, be in makeup bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(titanium dioxide, be in makeup)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(talc, be in makeup bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(titanium dioxide, be used in makeup)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(talc, be in makeup bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(silica, be in makeup)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(talc, be in makeup bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(silica, be used in makeup)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(talc, be in makeup bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(silica, be bad for skin)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(talc, be in makeup bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(titanium dioxide, be used in makeup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(titanium dioxide, be used in makeup)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(talc, be in makeup bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(silica, be used in makeup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(silica, be used in makeup)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(talc, be in makeup bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(titanium dioxide, be in makeup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(titanium dioxide, be in makeup)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(talc, be in makeup bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(silica, be bad for skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(silica, be bad for skin)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(talc, be in makeup bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(silica, be in makeup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(silica, be in makeup)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(talc, be in makeup bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(talc, be in makeup bad)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(talc, be in makeup bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(talc, be used in makeup)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(talc, be in makeup bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(talc, be in makeup)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(talc, be in makeup bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(talc, be used in makeup)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(talc, be in makeup bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(talc, be bad in eyeshadow)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(talc, be in makeup bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(talc, be bad in eyeshadow)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(talc, be in makeup bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(talc, be bad in eyeshadow)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(talc, be in makeup bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(talc, be in makeup)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(talc, be in makeup bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(talc, be bad for skin)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(talc, be in makeup bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(talc, be bad for skin)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(talc, be in makeup bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(talc, be bad in eyeshadow)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(talc, be in makeup bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(talc, be used in makeup)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(talc, be in makeup bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(talc, be bad for skin)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(talc, be in makeup bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(talc, be bad for skin)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(talc, be in makeup bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(talc, be in makeup)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(talc, be in makeup bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(talc, be in makeup)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(talc, be in makeup bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(talc, be used in makeup)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(talc, be in makeup bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(talc, be in makeup bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(talc, be in makeup bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(talc, be in makeup bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(talc, be in makeup bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(talc, be in makeup bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(titanium dioxide, be in makeup)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(talc, be in makeup bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(titanium dioxide, be used in makeup)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(talc, be in makeup bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(silica, be used in makeup)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(talc, be in makeup bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(silica, be in makeup)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(talc, be in makeup bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(silica, be bad for skin)