talent: affect side

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents quality
Weight: 0.64
, asset
Weight: 0.64
, factor
Weight: 0.62
, resource
Weight: 0.61
Siblings star
Weight: 0.67
, creativity
Weight: 0.64
, athletics
Weight: 0.62
, programmer
Weight: 0.59
, entertainer
Weight: 0.58

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect side 1.00
affect special side 0.90
affect side of dice 0.81
affect special side of dice 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(talent, affect side)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(talent, affect side)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(talent, affect side)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(talent, affect special side)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(talent, affect side)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(talent, affect special side)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(talent, affect side)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(talent, affect special side)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(talent, affect side)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(talent, affect special side of dice)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(talent, affect side)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(talent, affect side of dice)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(talent, affect side)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(talent, affect special side of dice)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(talent, affect side)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(talent, affect side of dice)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(talent, affect side)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(talent, affect special side)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(talent, affect side)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(talent, affect special side of dice)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(talent, affect side)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(talent, affect side of dice)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(talent, affect side)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(talent, affect special side of dice)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(talent, affect side)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(talent, affect side of dice)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(talent, affect side)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(talent, affect side)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(talent, affect side)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(talent, affect side)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(talent, affect side)