talent: affect side of dice

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents quality
Weight: 0.64
, asset
Weight: 0.64
, factor
Weight: 0.62
, resource
Weight: 0.61
Siblings star
Weight: 0.67
, creativity
Weight: 0.64
, athletics
Weight: 0.62
, programmer
Weight: 0.59
, entertainer
Weight: 0.58

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect side of dice 1.00
affect special side of dice 0.97
affect side 0.81
affect special side 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(talent, affect side of dice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(talent, affect side of dice)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(talent, affect side of dice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(talent, affect special side of dice)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(talent, affect side of dice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(talent, affect special side of dice)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(talent, affect side of dice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(talent, affect special side of dice)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(talent, affect side of dice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(talent, affect special side of dice)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(talent, affect side of dice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(talent, affect side)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(talent, affect side of dice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(talent, affect special side)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(talent, affect side of dice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(talent, affect side)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(talent, affect side of dice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(talent, affect special side)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(talent, affect side of dice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(talent, affect special side)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(talent, affect side of dice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(talent, affect side)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(talent, affect side of dice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(talent, affect special side)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(talent, affect side of dice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(talent, affect side)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(talent, affect side of dice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(talent, affect side of dice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(talent, affect side of dice)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(talent, affect side of dice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(talent, affect side of dice)