talent: be important to organization

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents quality
Weight: 0.64
, asset
Weight: 0.64
, factor
Weight: 0.62
, resource
Weight: 0.61
Siblings star
Weight: 0.67
, creativity
Weight: 0.64
, athletics
Weight: 0.62
, programmer
Weight: 0.59
, entertainer
Weight: 0.58

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to organization 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(quality, be important to organization)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(talent, be important to organization)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(talent, be important to organization)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(quality, be important to organization)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(talent, be important to organization)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(quality, be important to organization)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(quality, be important to organization)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(talent, be important to organization)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(talent, be important to organization)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(talent, be important to organization)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(talent, be important to organization)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(talent, be important to organization)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(talent, be important to organization)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(talent, be important to organization)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(talent, be important to organization)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(talent, be important to organization)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(talent, be important to organization)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(quality, be important to organization)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(talent, be important to organization)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(quality, be important to organization)