talent: work

Related concepts

Parents	quality Weight: 0.64 , asset Weight: 0.64 , factor Weight: 0.62 , resource Weight: 0.61
Siblings	star Weight: 0.67 , creativity Weight: 0.64 , athletics Weight: 0.62 , programmer Weight: 0.59 , entertainer Weight: 0.58

Related properties

Property	Similarity
work	1.00
be better than work	0.81
be better than hard work	0.80
beat hard work	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(factor, work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Typical(talent, work)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.44

Plausible(asset, work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Typical(talent, work)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.17

Plausible(talent, work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Plausible(asset, work)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.17

Plausible(talent, work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Plausible(factor, work)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(talent, work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(factor, work)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(talent, work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(asset, work)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(talent, work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(creativity, work)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(factor, work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

Remarkable(talent, work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Plausible(talent, work)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.44

Plausible(asset, work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

Remarkable(talent, work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Plausible(talent, work)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.17

Plausible(talent, work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

Remarkable(creativity, work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Plausible(creativity, work)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.17

Plausible(talent, work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Salient(talent, work)

Similarity expansion

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.68

Remarkable(talent, work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Remarkable(talent, be better than work)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.68

Remarkable(talent, work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Remarkable(talent, be better than hard work)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.68

Remarkable(talent, work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Remarkable(talent, beat hard work)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.17

Plausible(talent, work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Plausible(talent, be better than work)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.29

Salient(talent, work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Salient(talent, be better than work)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.17

Plausible(talent, work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Plausible(talent, beat hard work)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.29

Salient(talent, work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Salient(talent, beat hard work)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.29

Salient(talent, work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Salient(talent, be better than hard work)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.17

Plausible(talent, work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Plausible(talent, be better than hard work)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.11

Typical(talent, work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Typical(talent, be better than work)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.11

Typical(talent, work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Typical(talent, beat hard work)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.11

Typical(talent, work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Typical(talent, be better than hard work)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.29

Salient(talent, work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Typical(talent, work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(talent, work)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.17

Plausible(talent, work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Typical(talent, work)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(talent, work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Typical(asset, work)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(talent, work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Typical(factor, work)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(talent, work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Typical(creativity, work)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.11

Typical(talent, work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Typical(asset, work)

0.25

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.11

Typical(talent, work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Typical(factor, work)