talk: be used to work

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents talk show
Weight: 0.72
, show
Weight: 0.63
, tv show
Weight: 0.63
, thing
Weight: 0.62
Siblings think
Weight: 0.35
, remember
Weight: 0.34
, chat
Weight: 0.34
, game show
Weight: 0.33
, what
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to work 1.00
do not work well 0.84
be motivated by put it all together 0.76
be used to be 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(thing, do not work well)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(talk, be used to work)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(talk, be used to work)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(thing, do not work well)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(talk, be used to work)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(thing, do not work well)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(talk, be used to work)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(think, be used to be)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(thing, do not work well)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(talk, be used to work)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(talk, be used to work)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(talk, be used to work)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(think, be used to be)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(think, be used to be)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(talk, be used to work)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(talk, be used to work)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(talk, be used to work)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(talk, be used to work)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(talk, be used to work)

Typical implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(talk, be used to work)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(talk, be used to work)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(talk, be used to work)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(thing, do not work well)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(talk, be used to work)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(think, be used to be)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(talk, be used to work)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(thing, do not work well)