talk: causes exchange of idea

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents talk show
Weight: 0.72
, show
Weight: 0.63
, tv show
Weight: 0.63
, thing
Weight: 0.62
Siblings think
Weight: 0.35
, remember
Weight: 0.34
, chat
Weight: 0.34
, game show
Weight: 0.33
, what
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
causes exchange of idea 1.00
causes have idea 0.83
be used to get idea 0.81
causes you create idea 0.79
causes come up with idea 0.78
causes fresh idea 0.78
form idea 0.77
be used to form new idea 0.76
causes communicate idea and experience 0.75
be used to develop idea 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(talk, causes exchange of idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(think, causes have idea)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(talk, causes exchange of idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(think, be used to form new idea)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(talk, causes exchange of idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(think, be used to get idea)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(talk, causes exchange of idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(think, be used to develop idea)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(talk, causes exchange of idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(think, causes have idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(think, causes have idea)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(talk, causes exchange of idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(think, be used to get idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(think, be used to get idea)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(talk, causes exchange of idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(think, be used to form new idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(think, be used to form new idea)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(talk, causes exchange of idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(think, be used to develop idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(think, be used to develop idea)

Salient implies Plausible

0.12
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(talk, causes exchange of idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(talk, causes exchange of idea)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(talk, causes exchange of idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(talk, causes exchange of idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(talk, causes exchange of idea)

Typical implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(talk, causes exchange of idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(talk, causes exchange of idea)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(talk, causes exchange of idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(think, causes have idea)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(talk, causes exchange of idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(think, be used to get idea)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(talk, causes exchange of idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(think, be used to develop idea)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(talk, causes exchange of idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(think, be used to form new idea)