talking: be more effective over text

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.68
, word
Weight: 0.56
, behavior
Weight: 0.54
, activity
Weight: 0.54
, ability
Weight: 0.53
Siblings talk
Weight: 0.37
, talk show
Weight: 0.36
, laughing
Weight: 0.36
, living thing
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more effective over text 1.00
be more effective over then text 0.98
be more effective in person 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(talking, be more effective over text) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(talking, be more effective over text)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(talking, be more effective over text) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(talking, be more effective over then text)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(talking, be more effective over text) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(talking, be more effective over then text)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(talking, be more effective over text) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(talking, be more effective over then text)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(talking, be more effective over text) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(talking, be more effective over then text)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(talking, be more effective over text) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(talking, be more effective in person)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(talking, be more effective over text) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(talking, be more effective in person)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(talking, be more effective over text) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(talking, be more effective in person)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(talking, be more effective over text) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(talking, be more effective in person)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(talking, be more effective over text) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(talking, be more effective over text) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(talking, be more effective over text)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(talking, be more effective over text) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(talking, be more effective over text)