talking: be on phone

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.68
, word
Weight: 0.56
, behavior
Weight: 0.54
, activity
Weight: 0.54
, ability
Weight: 0.53
Siblings talk
Weight: 0.37
, talk show
Weight: 0.36
, laughing
Weight: 0.36
, living thing
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be on phone 1.00
be phone 0.99
is phone 0.98
is phone hard 0.92
be phone driving 0.88
is phone difficult 0.88
is phone awkward 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(talking, be on phone)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(talking, be on phone)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(talking, be on phone)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(talking, be phone driving)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(talking, be on phone)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(talking, be phone driving)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(talking, be on phone)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(talking, be phone driving)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(talking, be on phone)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(talking, is phone)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(talking, be on phone)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(talking, be phone)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(talking, be on phone)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(talking, be phone)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(talking, be on phone)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(talking, is phone)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(talking, be on phone)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(talking, be phone)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(talking, be on phone)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(talking, is phone)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(talking, be on phone)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(talking, is phone)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(talking, be on phone)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(talking, be phone driving)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(talking, be on phone)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(talking, be phone)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(talking, be on phone)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(talking, is phone hard)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(talking, be on phone)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(talking, is phone hard)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(talking, be on phone)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(talking, is phone hard)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(talking, be on phone)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(talking, is phone hard)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(talking, be on phone)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(talking, is phone awkward)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(talking, be on phone)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(talking, is phone awkward)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(talking, be on phone)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(talking, is phone awkward)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(talking, be on phone)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(talking, is phone awkward)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(talking, be on phone)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(talking, be on phone)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(talking, be on phone)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(talking, be on phone)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(talking, be on phone)