talking: is frowned upon

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.68
, word
Weight: 0.56
, behavior
Weight: 0.54
, activity
Weight: 0.54
, ability
Weight: 0.53
Siblings talk
Weight: 0.37
, talk show
Weight: 0.36
, laughing
Weight: 0.36
, living thing
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
is frowned upon 1.00
is period frowned upon 0.94
is frowned 0.91
is oneself frowned upon 0.86
is period frowned 0.85
is oneself frowned 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(talking, is frowned upon)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(laughing, is frowned upon)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(talking, is frowned upon)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(laughing, is frowned)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(talking, is frowned upon)
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(laughing, is frowned upon)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(laughing, is frowned upon)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(talking, is frowned upon)
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(laughing, is frowned)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(laughing, is frowned)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(talking, is frowned upon)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(talking, is frowned upon)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(talking, is frowned upon)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(talking, is frowned)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(talking, is frowned upon)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(talking, is frowned)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(talking, is frowned upon)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(talking, is frowned)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(talking, is frowned upon)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(talking, is frowned)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(talking, is frowned upon)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(talking, is period frowned upon)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(talking, is frowned upon)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(talking, is oneself frowned upon)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(talking, is frowned upon)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(talking, is oneself frowned)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(talking, is frowned upon)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(talking, is oneself frowned)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(talking, is frowned upon)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(talking, is oneself frowned upon)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(talking, is frowned upon)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(talking, is oneself frowned)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(talking, is frowned upon)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(talking, is oneself frowned)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(talking, is frowned upon)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(talking, is oneself frowned upon)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(talking, is frowned upon)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(talking, is oneself frowned upon)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(talking, is frowned upon)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(talking, is period frowned upon)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(talking, is frowned upon)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(talking, is period frowned upon)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(talking, is frowned upon)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(talking, is period frowned upon)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(talking, is frowned upon)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(talking, is frowned upon)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(talking, is frowned upon)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(talking, is frowned upon)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(talking, is frowned upon)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(talking, is frowned upon)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(laughing, is frowned upon)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(talking, is frowned upon)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(laughing, is frowned)