tangent: has quality function

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents topic
Weight: 0.53
, trigonometric function
Weight: 0.52
, function
Weight: 0.47
, straight line
Weight: 0.47
, issue
Weight: 0.46
Siblings dark matter
Weight: 0.31
, agenda
Weight: 0.30
, dissertation
Weight: 0.30
, relativity
Weight: 0.30
, story
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality function 1.00
has quality functions 0.91
is odd function 0.82
has quality good 0.78
has quality bad 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(straight line, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(tangent, has quality function)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(function, has quality functions)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(tangent, has quality function)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(tangent, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(straight line, has quality function)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(tangent, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(function, has quality functions)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(tangent, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(straight line, has quality function)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(tangent, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(function, has quality functions)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(tangent, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(relativity, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(tangent, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(agenda, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(tangent, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(agenda, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(tangent, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(story, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(straight line, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(tangent, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(tangent, has quality function)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(function, has quality functions)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(tangent, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(tangent, has quality function)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(tangent, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(relativity, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(relativity, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(tangent, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(story, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(story, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(tangent, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(agenda, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(agenda, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(tangent, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(agenda, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(agenda, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(tangent, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(tangent, has quality function)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(tangent, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(tangent, is odd function)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(tangent, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(tangent, is odd function)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(tangent, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(tangent, is odd function)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(tangent, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(tangent, is odd function)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(tangent, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(tangent, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(tangent, has quality function)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(tangent, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(tangent, has quality function)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(tangent, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(straight line, has quality function)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(tangent, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(function, has quality functions)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(tangent, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(relativity, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(tangent, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(agenda, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(tangent, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(agenda, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(tangent, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(story, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(tangent, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(straight line, has quality function)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(tangent, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(function, has quality functions)