tank: were helpful

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents part
Weight: 0.58
, equipment
Weight: 0.58
, weapon
Weight: 0.57
, item
Weight: 0.57
, hardware
Weight: 0.57
Siblings gas tank
Weight: 0.63
, riser
Weight: 0.42
, tank top
Weight: 0.36
, rocket launcher
Weight: 0.32
, diesel engine
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
were helpful 1.00
were useful 0.92
were useful in ww1 0.92
were more useful on front 0.82
were important in 1918 0.82
were used in good way 0.79
were more useful on western front 0.77
were used in way 0.77
were effective in ww1 0.77
were effective 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(tank, were helpful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(tank, were helpful)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(tank, were helpful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(tank, were useful)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(tank, were helpful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(tank, were useful in ww1)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(tank, were helpful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(tank, were useful)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(tank, were helpful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(tank, were useful)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(tank, were helpful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(tank, were useful in ww1)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(tank, were helpful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(tank, were useful in ww1)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(tank, were helpful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(tank, were useful in ww1)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(tank, were helpful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(tank, were useful)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(tank, were helpful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(tank, were important in 1918)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(tank, were helpful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(tank, were more useful on western front)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(tank, were helpful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(tank, were effective)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(tank, were helpful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(tank, were effective in ww1)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(tank, were helpful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(tank, were important in 1918)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(tank, were helpful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(tank, were important in 1918)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(tank, were helpful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(tank, were important in 1918)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(tank, were helpful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(tank, were effective)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(tank, were helpful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(tank, were more useful on western front)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(tank, were helpful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(tank, were effective)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(tank, were helpful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(tank, were more useful on western front)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(tank, were helpful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(tank, were more useful on western front)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(tank, were helpful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(tank, were effective in ww1)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(tank, were helpful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(tank, were effective in ww1)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(tank, were helpful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(tank, were effective in ww1)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(tank, were helpful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(tank, were effective)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(tank, were helpful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(tank, were helpful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(tank, were helpful)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(tank, were helpful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(tank, were helpful)