tap: be made of stainless steel

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tool
Weight: 0.62
, event
Weight: 0.54
, application
Weight: 0.53
, issue
Weight: 0.52
Siblings filter
Weight: 0.32
, monkey wrench
Weight: 0.31
, punch
Weight: 0.31
, leverage
Weight: 0.31
, spreadsheet
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be made of stainless steel 1.00
be made of steel 0.93
made from mild steel 0.83
be made of metal 0.82
is metal 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(tool, is metal)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(tap, be made of stainless steel)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(tool, be made of metal)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(tap, be made of stainless steel)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(tool, be made of steel)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(tap, be made of stainless steel)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(tap, be made of stainless steel)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(tool, be made of steel)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(tap, be made of stainless steel)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(tool, be made of metal)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(tap, be made of stainless steel)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(tool, is metal)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(tap, be made of stainless steel)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(tool, be made of steel)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(tap, be made of stainless steel)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(tool, be made of metal)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(tap, be made of stainless steel)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(tool, is metal)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(tap, be made of stainless steel)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(punch, made from mild steel)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(tool, is metal)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(tap, be made of stainless steel)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(tap, be made of stainless steel)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(tool, be made of steel)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(tap, be made of stainless steel)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(tap, be made of stainless steel)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(tool, be made of metal)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(tap, be made of stainless steel)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(tap, be made of stainless steel)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(tap, be made of stainless steel)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(punch, made from mild steel)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(punch, made from mild steel)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(tap, be made of stainless steel)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(tap, be made of stainless steel)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(tap, be made of stainless steel)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(tap, be made of steel)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(tap, be made of stainless steel)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(tap, be made of steel)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(tap, be made of stainless steel)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(tap, be made of steel)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(tap, be made of stainless steel)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(tap, be made of steel)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(tap, be made of stainless steel)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(tap, be made of metal)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(tap, be made of stainless steel)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(tap, be made of metal)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(tap, be made of stainless steel)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(tap, be made of metal)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(tap, be made of stainless steel)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(tap, be made of metal)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(tap, be made of stainless steel)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(tap, be made of stainless steel)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(tap, be made of stainless steel)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(tap, be made of stainless steel)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(tap, be made of stainless steel)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(tap, be made of stainless steel)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(tool, be made of steel)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(tap, be made of stainless steel)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(tool, be made of metal)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(tap, be made of stainless steel)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(tool, is metal)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(tap, be made of stainless steel)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(punch, made from mild steel)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(tap, be made of stainless steel)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(tool, be made of steel)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(tap, be made of stainless steel)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(tool, be made of metal)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(tap, be made of stainless steel)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(tool, is metal)