tape dispenser: be at office build

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents item
Weight: 0.61
, thing
Weight: 0.60
, object
Weight: 0.54
Siblings tape
Weight: 0.37
, duct tape
Weight: 0.36
, scotch tape
Weight: 0.35
, tape measure
Weight: 0.35
, paper clip
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at office build 1.00
be at office 0.88
be at post office 0.81
be at office supply store 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(tape dispenser, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(paper clip, be at office supply store)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(tape dispenser, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(paper clip, be at office supply store)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(paper clip, be at office supply store)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(tape dispenser, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(tape dispenser, be at office build)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(tape dispenser, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(tape dispenser, be at office)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(tape dispenser, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(tape dispenser, be at office)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(tape dispenser, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(tape dispenser, be at office)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(tape dispenser, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(tape dispenser, be at post office)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(tape dispenser, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(tape dispenser, be at post office)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(tape dispenser, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(tape dispenser, be at office supply store)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(tape dispenser, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(tape dispenser, be at office)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(tape dispenser, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(tape dispenser, be at post office)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(tape dispenser, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(tape dispenser, be at office supply store)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(tape dispenser, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(tape dispenser, be at office supply store)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(tape dispenser, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(tape dispenser, be at post office)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(tape dispenser, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(tape dispenser, be at office supply store)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(tape dispenser, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(tape dispenser, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(tape dispenser, be at office build)

Typical implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(tape dispenser, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(tape dispenser, be at office build)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(tape dispenser, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(paper clip, be at office supply store)