tarantula: has state pets

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents spider
Weight: 0.66
, arachnid
Weight: 0.64
, pet
Weight: 0.58
, creature
Weight: 0.58
, species
Weight: 0.56
Siblings scorpion
Weight: 0.37
, lizard
Weight: 0.37
, cockroach
Weight: 0.36
, spider monkey
Weight: 0.35
, monkey
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state pets 1.00
make pets 0.93
has state pet 0.91
make good pets 0.90
keep frogs as pets 0.86
is good pet 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(tarantula, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(tarantula, has state pets)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(tarantula, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(tarantula, make pets)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(tarantula, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(tarantula, keep frogs as pets)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(tarantula, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(tarantula, keep frogs as pets)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(tarantula, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(tarantula, keep frogs as pets)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(tarantula, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(tarantula, make pets)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(tarantula, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(tarantula, has state pet)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(tarantula, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(tarantula, make pets)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(tarantula, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(tarantula, make good pets)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(tarantula, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(tarantula, keep frogs as pets)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(tarantula, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(tarantula, is good pet)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(tarantula, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(tarantula, make good pets)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(tarantula, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(tarantula, has state pet)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(tarantula, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(tarantula, make good pets)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(tarantula, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(tarantula, has state pet)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(tarantula, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(tarantula, make good pets)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(tarantula, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(tarantula, is good pet)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(tarantula, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(tarantula, make pets)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(tarantula, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(tarantula, is good pet)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(tarantula, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(tarantula, has state pet)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(tarantula, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(tarantula, is good pet)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(tarantula, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(tarantula, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(tarantula, has state pets)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(tarantula, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(tarantula, has state pets)