tarantula: is good pet

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents spider
Weight: 0.66
, arachnid
Weight: 0.64
, pet
Weight: 0.58
, creature
Weight: 0.58
, species
Weight: 0.56
Siblings scorpion
Weight: 0.37
, lizard
Weight: 0.37
, cockroach
Weight: 0.36
, spider monkey
Weight: 0.35
, monkey
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is good pet 1.00
has state pet 0.94
make good pets 0.89
make pets 0.86
has state pets 0.85
keep frogs as pets 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(tarantula, is good pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(tarantula, is good pet)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(tarantula, is good pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(tarantula, has state pet)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(tarantula, is good pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(tarantula, has state pet)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(tarantula, is good pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(tarantula, make good pets)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(tarantula, is good pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(tarantula, has state pet)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(tarantula, is good pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(tarantula, make good pets)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(tarantula, is good pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(tarantula, make pets)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(tarantula, is good pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(tarantula, make pets)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(tarantula, is good pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(tarantula, has state pets)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(tarantula, is good pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(tarantula, make good pets)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(tarantula, is good pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(tarantula, make pets)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(tarantula, is good pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(tarantula, has state pets)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(tarantula, is good pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(tarantula, keep frogs as pets)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(tarantula, is good pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(tarantula, has state pets)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(tarantula, is good pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(tarantula, keep frogs as pets)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(tarantula, is good pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(tarantula, keep frogs as pets)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(tarantula, is good pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(tarantula, keep frogs as pets)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(tarantula, is good pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(tarantula, make good pets)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(tarantula, is good pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(tarantula, has state pet)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(tarantula, is good pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(tarantula, has state pets)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(tarantula, is good pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(tarantula, make pets)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(tarantula, is good pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(tarantula, is good pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(tarantula, is good pet)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(tarantula, is good pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(tarantula, is good pet)