tare: is net worth

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents function
Weight: 0.45
, feature
Weight: 0.30
, weed
Weight: 0.29
, wheat
Weight: 0.24
Siblings trigonometric function
Weight: 0.31
, simple function
Weight: 0.29
, polynomial
Weight: 0.29
, lcd
Weight: 0.29
, iso
Weight: 0.29

Related properties

Property Similarity
is net worth 1.00
is net 0.93
has quality worth 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(tare, is net worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(iso, has quality worth)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(tare, is net worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(iso, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(iso, has quality worth)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(tare, is net worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(tare, is net worth)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(tare, is net worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(tare, is net)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(tare, is net worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(tare, is net)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(tare, is net worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(tare, is net)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(tare, is net worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(tare, has quality worth)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(tare, is net worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(tare, has quality worth)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(tare, is net worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(tare, is net)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(tare, is net worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(tare, has quality worth)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(tare, is net worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(tare, has quality worth)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(tare, is net worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(tare, is net worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(tare, is net worth)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(tare, is net worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(tare, is net worth)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(tare, is net worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(iso, has quality worth)