target: be at sport good store

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents goal
Weight: 0.62
, competitor
Weight: 0.62
, term
Weight: 0.59
, grocery store
Weight: 0.59
Siblings face
Weight: 0.61
, head
Weight: 0.61
, spanish restaurant
Weight: 0.57
, pentagon
Weight: 0.56
, supply
Weight: 0.55

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at sport good store 1.00
be at sport event 0.84
be store 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(competitor, be at sport event) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(target, be at sport good store)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(target, be at sport good store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(competitor, be at sport event)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(target, be at sport good store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(competitor, be at sport event)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(target, be at sport good store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(supply, be store)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(competitor, be at sport event) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(target, be at sport good store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(target, be at sport good store)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(target, be at sport good store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(supply, be store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(supply, be store)

Salient implies Plausible

0.14
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(target, be at sport good store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(target, be at sport good store)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(target, be at sport good store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(target, be at sport good store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(target, be at sport good store)

Typical implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(target, be at sport good store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(target, be at sport good store)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(target, be at sport good store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(competitor, be at sport event)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(target, be at sport good store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(supply, be store)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(target, be at sport good store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(competitor, be at sport event)