target: be better than walmart

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents goal
Weight: 0.62
, competitor
Weight: 0.62
, option
Weight: 0.62
, factor
Weight: 0.60
Siblings face
Weight: 0.61
, head
Weight: 0.61
, command post
Weight: 0.60
, radar station
Weight: 0.59
, synagogue
Weight: 0.59

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than walmart 1.00
be more expensive than walmart 0.96
shop at then walmart 0.90
shop at walmart 0.90
compete against walmart 0.88
be online cheaper than than store 0.80
have starbucks 0.77
is i d on new iphone 0.76
be better than one 0.76
is i d on iphone 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(target, be better than walmart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(head, be better than one)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(target, be better than walmart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(head, be better than one) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(head, be better than one)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(target, be better than walmart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(target, be better than walmart)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(target, be better than walmart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(target, shop at then walmart)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(target, be better than walmart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(target, be more expensive than walmart)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(target, be better than walmart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(target, shop at then walmart)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(target, be better than walmart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(target, shop at then walmart)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(target, be better than walmart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(target, shop at then walmart)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(target, be better than walmart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(target, be more expensive than walmart)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(target, be better than walmart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(target, be more expensive than walmart)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(target, be better than walmart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(target, compete against walmart)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(target, be better than walmart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(target, be online cheaper than than store)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(target, be better than walmart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(target, be more expensive than walmart)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(target, be better than walmart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(target, be online cheaper than than store)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(target, be better than walmart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(target, be online cheaper than than store)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(target, be better than walmart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(target, be online cheaper than than store)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(target, be better than walmart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(target, compete against walmart)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(target, be better than walmart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(target, compete against walmart)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(target, be better than walmart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(target, have starbucks)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(target, be better than walmart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(target, have starbucks)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(target, be better than walmart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(target, have starbucks)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(target, be better than walmart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(target, have starbucks)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(target, be better than walmart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(target, compete against walmart)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(target, be better than walmart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(target, be better than walmart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(target, be better than walmart)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(target, be better than walmart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(target, be better than walmart)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(target, be better than walmart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(head, be better than one)