target: be good company work for

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents goal
Weight: 0.62
, competitor
Weight: 0.62
, option
Weight: 0.62
, factor
Weight: 0.60
Siblings face
Weight: 0.61
, head
Weight: 0.61
, command post
Weight: 0.60
, radar station
Weight: 0.59
, synagogue
Weight: 0.59

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good company work for 1.00
be good company work 0.99
is good company 0.95
has state company 0.84
be good place work 0.81
be important in business 0.81
be important to business 0.80
be good for us 0.80
is low cost strategy company 0.80
is cost strategy company 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(factor, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(target, be good company work for)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(goal, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(target, be good company work for)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(goal, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(target, be good company work for)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(target, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(goal, be important in business)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(target, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(goal, be good for us)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(target, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(factor, be important in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(target, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(goal, be important in business)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(target, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(goal, be good for us)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(target, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(factor, be important in business)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(factor, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(target, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(target, be good company work for)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(goal, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(target, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(target, be good company work for)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(goal, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(target, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(target, be good company work for)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(target, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(target, be good company work for)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(target, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(target, is good company)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(target, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(target, is good company)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(target, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(target, is good company)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(target, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(target, be good place work)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(target, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(target, be good place work)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(target, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(target, be important to business)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(target, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(target, is low cost strategy company)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(target, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(target, be important to business)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(target, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(target, is low cost strategy company)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(target, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(target, be good place work)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(target, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(target, be important to business)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(target, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(target, is low cost strategy company)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(target, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(target, is good company)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(target, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(target, is low cost strategy company)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(target, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(target, be good place work)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(target, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(target, be important to business)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(target, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(target, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(target, be good company work for)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(target, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(target, be good company work for)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(target, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(goal, be important in business)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(target, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(goal, be good for us)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(target, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(factor, be important in business)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(target, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(goal, be important in business)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(target, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(factor, be important in business)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(target, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(goal, be good for us)