tarn: has quality price

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents river
Weight: 0.43
, word
Weight: 0.42
, lake
Weight: 0.30
, friend
Weight: 0.29
, control
Weight: 0.25
Siblings lake tahoe
Weight: 0.31
, lake erie
Weight: 0.31
, lake superior
Weight: 0.30
, nile
Weight: 0.29
, valley
Weight: 0.29

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality price 1.00
price 0.94
is price history 0.87
has quality good 0.80
has quality bad 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(word, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(tarn, has quality price)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(friend, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(tarn, has quality price)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(control, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(tarn, has quality price)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(tarn, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(friend, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(tarn, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(control, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(tarn, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(word, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(tarn, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(control, has quality bad)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(tarn, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(word, has quality bad)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(tarn, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(friend, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(word, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(tarn, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(tarn, has quality price)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(friend, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(tarn, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(tarn, has quality price)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(control, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(tarn, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(tarn, has quality price)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(tarn, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(tarn, has quality price)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(tarn, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(tarn, price)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(tarn, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(tarn, price)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(tarn, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(tarn, price)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(tarn, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(tarn, is price history)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(tarn, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(tarn, is price history)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(tarn, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(tarn, is price history)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(tarn, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(tarn, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(tarn, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(tarn, price)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(tarn, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(tarn, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(tarn, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(tarn, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(tarn, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(tarn, is price history)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(tarn, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(tarn, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(tarn, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(tarn, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(tarn, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(tarn, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(tarn, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(tarn, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(tarn, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(tarn, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(tarn, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(tarn, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(tarn, has quality price)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(tarn, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(tarn, has quality price)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(tarn, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(friend, has quality good)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(tarn, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(control, has quality bad)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(tarn, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(word, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(tarn, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(friend, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(tarn, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(control, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(tarn, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(word, has quality bad)