tarn: is card list

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents river
Weight: 0.43
, word
Weight: 0.42
, lake
Weight: 0.30
, friend
Weight: 0.29
, control
Weight: 0.25
Siblings lake tahoe
Weight: 0.31
, lake erie
Weight: 0.31
, lake superior
Weight: 0.30
, nile
Weight: 0.29
, valley
Weight: 0.29

Related properties

Property Similarity
is zendikar card list 1.00
is card list 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(tarn, is card list)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(tarn, is card list)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(tarn, is card list)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(tarn, is zendikar card list)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(tarn, is card list)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(tarn, is zendikar card list)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(tarn, is card list)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(tarn, is zendikar card list)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(tarn, is card list)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(tarn, is zendikar card list)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(tarn, is card list)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(tarn, is card list)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(tarn, is card list)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(tarn, is card list)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(tarn, is card list)