tarsier: has physical part fingers

Related concepts

Parents	primate Weight: 0.66 , animal Weight: 0.62 , species Weight: 0.38 , wildlife Weight: 0.28 , bird Weight: 0.26
Siblings	bonobo Weight: 0.36 , tapir Weight: 0.35 , cassowary Weight: 0.35 , orangutan Weight: 0.35 , spider monkey Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has physical part fingers	1.00
have long fingers	0.93
has physical part eyes	0.84
has physical part tails	0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 1.00

Plausible(animal, has physical part eyes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Typical(tarsier, has physical part fingers)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 1.00

Plausible(animal, has physical part tails) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Typical(tarsier, has physical part fingers)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(primate, has physical part tails) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Typical(tarsier, has physical part fingers)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.30

Plausible(tarsier, has physical part fingers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Plausible(primate, has physical part tails)

0.02

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.30

Plausible(tarsier, has physical part fingers) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Plausible(animal, has physical part eyes)

0.02

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.30

Plausible(tarsier, has physical part fingers) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Plausible(animal, has physical part tails)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(tarsier, has physical part fingers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(primate, has physical part tails)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(tarsier, has physical part fingers) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Remarkable(animal, has physical part eyes)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(tarsier, has physical part fingers) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Remarkable(animal, has physical part tails)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(tarsier, has physical part fingers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Remarkable(spider monkey, has physical part tails)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 1.00

Plausible(animal, has physical part eyes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

Remarkable(tarsier, has physical part fingers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Plausible(tarsier, has physical part fingers)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 1.00

Plausible(animal, has physical part tails) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

Remarkable(tarsier, has physical part fingers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Plausible(tarsier, has physical part fingers)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(primate, has physical part tails) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

Remarkable(tarsier, has physical part fingers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Plausible(tarsier, has physical part fingers)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.30

Plausible(tarsier, has physical part fingers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

Remarkable(spider monkey, has physical part tails) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Plausible(spider monkey, has physical part tails)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.30

Plausible(tarsier, has physical part fingers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Salient(tarsier, has physical part fingers)

Similarity expansion

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.40

Remarkable(tarsier, has physical part fingers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(tarsier, has physical part eyes)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.30

Salient(tarsier, has physical part fingers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Salient(tarsier, has physical part eyes)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.30

Plausible(tarsier, has physical part fingers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Plausible(tarsier, has physical part eyes)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.38

Typical(tarsier, has physical part fingers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Typical(tarsier, has physical part eyes)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.40

Remarkable(tarsier, has physical part fingers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Remarkable(tarsier, has physical part tails)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.40

Remarkable(tarsier, has physical part fingers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Remarkable(tarsier, have long fingers)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.30

Salient(tarsier, has physical part fingers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Salient(tarsier, has physical part tails)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.30

Plausible(tarsier, has physical part fingers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Plausible(tarsier, has physical part tails)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.38

Typical(tarsier, has physical part fingers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Typical(tarsier, has physical part tails)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.38

Typical(tarsier, has physical part fingers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Typical(tarsier, have long fingers)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.30

Plausible(tarsier, has physical part fingers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Plausible(tarsier, have long fingers)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.30

Salient(tarsier, has physical part fingers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Salient(tarsier, have long fingers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.30

Salient(tarsier, has physical part fingers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Typical(tarsier, has physical part fingers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(tarsier, has physical part fingers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.30

Plausible(tarsier, has physical part fingers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Typical(tarsier, has physical part fingers)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(tarsier, has physical part fingers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Typical(primate, has physical part tails)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(tarsier, has physical part fingers) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Typical(animal, has physical part eyes)

0.25

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(tarsier, has physical part fingers) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Typical(animal, has physical part tails)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(tarsier, has physical part fingers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Typical(spider monkey, has physical part tails)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.38

Typical(tarsier, has physical part fingers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Typical(primate, has physical part tails)

0.16

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.38

Typical(tarsier, has physical part fingers) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Typical(animal, has physical part eyes)

0.15

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.38

Typical(tarsier, has physical part fingers) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Typical(animal, has physical part tails)