tart: has state taste

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dessert
Weight: 0.70
, recipe
Weight: 0.57
, sweet
Weight: 0.52
, pastry
Weight: 0.46
Siblings tiramisu
Weight: 0.38
, flan
Weight: 0.37
, custard
Weight: 0.37
, chocolate cake
Weight: 0.36
, sorbet
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state taste 1.00
taste 0.92
taste good 0.89
taste salty 0.84
taste bitter 0.84
taste sour 0.83
taste foods 0.82
taste then healthier foods 0.78
taste healthier foods 0.77
taste better then healthier foods 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(dessert, taste good)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(tart, has state taste)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(dessert, taste better then healthier foods)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(tart, has state taste)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(sweet, taste good)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(tart, has state taste)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(dessert, taste healthier foods)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(tart, has state taste)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(dessert, taste then healthier foods)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(tart, has state taste)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(dessert, taste foods)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(tart, has state taste)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(sweet, taste salty)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(tart, has state taste)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(sweet, taste sour)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(tart, has state taste)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(sweet, taste bitter)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(tart, has state taste)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(tart, has state taste)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(sweet, taste bitter)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(tart, has state taste)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(sweet, taste sour)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(tart, has state taste)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(sweet, taste salty)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(tart, has state taste)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(sweet, taste good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(tart, has state taste)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(dessert, taste foods)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(tart, has state taste)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(dessert, taste then healthier foods)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(tart, has state taste)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(dessert, taste healthier foods)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(tart, has state taste)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(dessert, taste good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(tart, has state taste)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(dessert, taste better then healthier foods)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(tart, has state taste)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(sweet, taste bitter)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(tart, has state taste)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(sweet, taste sour)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(tart, has state taste)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(sweet, taste salty)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(tart, has state taste)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(dessert, taste good)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(tart, has state taste)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(dessert, taste healthier foods)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(tart, has state taste)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(dessert, taste better then healthier foods)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(tart, has state taste)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(dessert, taste then healthier foods)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(tart, has state taste)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(sweet, taste good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(tart, has state taste)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(dessert, taste foods)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(tart, has state taste)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(custard, taste)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(dessert, taste good)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(tart, has state taste)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(tart, has state taste)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(sweet, taste good)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(tart, has state taste)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(tart, has state taste)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(sweet, taste salty)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(tart, has state taste)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(tart, has state taste)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(dessert, taste foods)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(tart, has state taste)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(tart, has state taste)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(dessert, taste better then healthier foods)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(tart, has state taste)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(tart, has state taste)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(sweet, taste bitter)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(tart, has state taste)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(tart, has state taste)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(sweet, taste sour)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(tart, has state taste)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(tart, has state taste)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(dessert, taste healthier foods)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(tart, has state taste)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(tart, has state taste)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(dessert, taste then healthier foods)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(tart, has state taste)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(tart, has state taste)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(tart, has state taste)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(custard, taste)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(custard, taste)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(tart, has state taste)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(tart, has state taste)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(tart, has state taste)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(tart, has state taste)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(tart, has state taste)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(tart, has state taste)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(tart, has state taste)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(tart, has state taste)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(sweet, taste good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(tart, has state taste)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(dessert, taste foods)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(tart, has state taste)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(sweet, taste bitter)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(tart, has state taste)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(sweet, taste sour)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(tart, has state taste)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(sweet, taste salty)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(tart, has state taste)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(dessert, taste then healthier foods)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(tart, has state taste)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(dessert, taste healthier foods)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(tart, has state taste)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(dessert, taste better then healthier foods)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(tart, has state taste)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(dessert, taste good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(tart, has state taste)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(custard, taste)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(tart, has state taste)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(sweet, taste good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(tart, has state taste)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(dessert, taste foods)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(tart, has state taste)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(sweet, taste bitter)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(tart, has state taste)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(sweet, taste sour)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(tart, has state taste)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(sweet, taste salty)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(tart, has state taste)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(dessert, taste then healthier foods)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(tart, has state taste)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(dessert, taste healthier foods)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(tart, has state taste)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(dessert, taste better then healthier foods)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(tart, has state taste)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(dessert, taste good)