taste sweet: has quality question

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents -
Siblings -

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality question 1.00
has quality questions 0.92

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(taste sweet, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(taste sweet, has quality question)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(taste sweet, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(taste sweet, has quality questions)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(taste sweet, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(taste sweet, has quality questions)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(taste sweet, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(taste sweet, has quality questions)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(taste sweet, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(taste sweet, has quality questions)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(taste sweet, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(taste sweet, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(taste sweet, has quality question)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(taste sweet, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(taste sweet, has quality question)