taste: be related to concentration

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents quality
Weight: 0.69
, trait
Weight: 0.66
, sensation
Weight: 0.65
, characteristic
Weight: 0.61
, factor
Weight: 0.61
Siblings flavor
Weight: 0.36
, smell
Weight: 0.34
, texture
Weight: 0.34
, passion
Weight: 0.33
, friendliness
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related to concentration 1.00
be related 0.78
be related to number 0.78
is related 0.78
be related to area 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(characteristic, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(taste, be related to concentration)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(trait, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(taste, be related to concentration)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(factor, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(taste, be related to concentration)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(quality, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(taste, be related to concentration)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(factor, be related to area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(taste, be related to concentration)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(factor, be related to number) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(taste, be related to concentration)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(taste, be related to concentration) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(factor, be related to number)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(taste, be related to concentration) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(factor, be related to area)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(taste, be related to concentration) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(quality, be related)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(taste, be related to concentration) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(factor, be related)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(taste, be related to concentration) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(trait, be related)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(taste, be related to concentration) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(characteristic, be related)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(taste, be related to concentration) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(quality, be related)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(taste, be related to concentration) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(characteristic, be related)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(taste, be related to concentration) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(trait, be related)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(taste, be related to concentration) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(factor, be related to number)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(taste, be related to concentration) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(factor, be related)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(taste, be related to concentration) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(factor, be related to area)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(taste, be related to concentration) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(smell, be related)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(taste, be related to concentration) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(smell, is related)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(characteristic, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(taste, be related to concentration) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(taste, be related to concentration)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(trait, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(taste, be related to concentration) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(taste, be related to concentration)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(factor, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(taste, be related to concentration) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(taste, be related to concentration)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(quality, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(taste, be related to concentration) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(taste, be related to concentration)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(factor, be related to number) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(taste, be related to concentration) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(taste, be related to concentration)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(factor, be related to area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(taste, be related to concentration) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(taste, be related to concentration)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(taste, be related to concentration) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(smell, is related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(smell, is related)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(taste, be related to concentration) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(smell, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(smell, be related)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(taste, be related to concentration) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(taste, be related to concentration)

Similarity expansion

0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(taste, be related to concentration) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(taste, be related)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(taste, be related to concentration) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(taste, is related)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(taste, be related to concentration) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(taste, be related)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(taste, be related to concentration) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(taste, be related)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(taste, be related to concentration) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(taste, is related)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(taste, be related to concentration) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(taste, is related)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(taste, be related to concentration) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(taste, be related)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(taste, be related to concentration) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(taste, is related)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(taste, be related to concentration) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(taste, be related to concentration) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(taste, be related to concentration)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(taste, be related to concentration) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(taste, be related to concentration)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(taste, be related to concentration) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(factor, be related to number)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(taste, be related to concentration) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(factor, be related to area)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(taste, be related to concentration) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(factor, be related)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(taste, be related to concentration) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(quality, be related)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(taste, be related to concentration) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(trait, be related)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(taste, be related to concentration) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(characteristic, be related)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(taste, be related to concentration) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(smell, be related)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(taste, be related to concentration) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(smell, is related)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(taste, be related to concentration) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(factor, be related to number)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(taste, be related to concentration) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(factor, be related to area)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(taste, be related to concentration) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(factor, be related)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(taste, be related to concentration) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(quality, be related)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(taste, be related to concentration) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(trait, be related)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(taste, be related to concentration) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(characteristic, be related)