taste: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents quality
Weight: 0.69
, trait
Weight: 0.66
, sensation
Weight: 0.65
, characteristic
Weight: 0.61
, factor
Weight: 0.61
Siblings flavor
Weight: 0.36
, smell
Weight: 0.34
, texture
Weight: 0.34
, passion
Weight: 0.33
, friendliness
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality system 0.84
is good value 0.81
has quality question 0.77
has quality mark 0.77
be better than quantity 0.77
has quality questions 0.76
be bad on snapchat 0.76
be bad on instagram 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(characteristic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(taste, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(quality, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(taste, has quality good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(quality, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(taste, has quality good)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(quality, be better than quantity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(taste, has quality good)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(quality, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(taste, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(quality, be bad on snapchat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(taste, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(quality, be bad on instagram) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(taste, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(taste, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(quality, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(taste, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(quality, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(taste, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(characteristic, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(taste, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(quality, has quality system)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(taste, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(quality, be bad on instagram)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(taste, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(quality, be bad on snapchat)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(taste, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(quality, be better than quantity)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(taste, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(quality, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(taste, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(quality, be bad on instagram)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(taste, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(quality, be bad on snapchat)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(taste, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(characteristic, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(taste, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(quality, be better than quantity)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(taste, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(quality, has quality good)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(taste, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(quality, has quality system)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(taste, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(flavor, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(taste, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(passion, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(taste, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(texture, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(taste, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(smell, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(taste, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(passion, is good value)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(taste, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(texture, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(taste, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(passion, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(taste, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(passion, has quality mark)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(characteristic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(taste, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(taste, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(quality, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(taste, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(taste, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(quality, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(taste, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(taste, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(quality, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(taste, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(taste, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(quality, be better than quantity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(taste, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(taste, has quality good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(quality, be bad on snapchat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(taste, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(taste, has quality good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(quality, be bad on instagram) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(taste, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(taste, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(taste, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(passion, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(passion, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(taste, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(smell, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(smell, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(taste, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(passion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(passion, has quality bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(taste, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(flavor, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(flavor, has quality bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(taste, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(texture, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(texture, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(taste, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(texture, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(texture, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(taste, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(passion, is good value) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(passion, is good value)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(taste, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(passion, has quality mark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(passion, has quality mark)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(taste, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(taste, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(taste, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(taste, has quality question)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(taste, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(taste, has quality questions)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(taste, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(taste, has quality questions)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(taste, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(taste, has quality question)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(taste, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(taste, has quality question)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(taste, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(taste, has quality questions)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(taste, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(taste, has quality question)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(taste, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(taste, has quality questions)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(taste, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(taste, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(taste, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(taste, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(taste, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(taste, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(quality, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(taste, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(quality, has quality system)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(taste, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(quality, be bad on instagram)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(taste, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(quality, be bad on snapchat)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(taste, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(quality, be better than quantity)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(taste, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(quality, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(taste, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(characteristic, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(taste, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(passion, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(taste, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(passion, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(taste, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(flavor, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(taste, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(passion, is good value)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(taste, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(texture, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(taste, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(smell, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(taste, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(passion, has quality mark)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(taste, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(texture, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(taste, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(quality, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(taste, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(quality, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(taste, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(characteristic, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(taste, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(quality, has quality system)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(taste, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(quality, be bad on instagram)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(taste, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(quality, be bad on snapchat)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(taste, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(quality, be better than quantity)