taste: has state love

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents quality
Weight: 0.69
, trait
Weight: 0.66
, sensation
Weight: 0.65
, characteristic
Weight: 0.61
, factor
Weight: 0.61
Siblings flavor
Weight: 0.36
, smell
Weight: 0.34
, texture
Weight: 0.34
, passion
Weight: 0.33
, friendliness
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state love 1.00
has state dislike 0.84
has state taste 0.78
has state job 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(factor, has state dislike)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(taste, has state love)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(taste, has state love)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(factor, has state dislike)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(taste, has state love)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(factor, has state dislike)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(taste, has state love)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(smell, has state taste)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(factor, has state dislike)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(taste, has state love)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(taste, has state love)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(taste, has state love)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(smell, has state taste)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(smell, has state taste)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(taste, has state love)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(taste, has state love)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(taste, has state love)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(taste, has state love)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(taste, has state love)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(taste, has state love)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(taste, has state love)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(taste, has state love)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(factor, has state dislike)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(taste, has state love)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(smell, has state taste)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(taste, has state love)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(factor, has state dislike)