tastebud: interpret taste

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sen
Weight: 0.38
, place
Weight: 0.36
, reason
Weight: 0.34
, experience
Weight: 0.31
, test
Weight: 0.22
Siblings fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.27
, taste bud
Weight: 0.27
, magic mountain
Weight: 0.27
, dining table
Weight: 0.27
, carmel
Weight: 0.27

Related properties

Property Similarity
interpret taste 1.00
taste things 0.80
like tastes 0.76
like different tastes 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.04
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(tastebud, interpret taste)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(taste bud, like tastes)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.04
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(tastebud, interpret taste)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(taste bud, like different tastes)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(tastebud, interpret taste)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(taste bud, like different tastes)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(taste bud, like different tastes)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(tastebud, interpret taste)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(taste bud, like tastes)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(taste bud, like tastes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(tastebud, interpret taste)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(tastebud, interpret taste)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(tastebud, interpret taste)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(tastebud, taste things)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(tastebud, interpret taste)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(tastebud, taste things)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(tastebud, interpret taste)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(tastebud, taste things)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(tastebud, interpret taste)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(tastebud, taste things)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(tastebud, interpret taste)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(tastebud, interpret taste)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(tastebud, interpret taste)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(tastebud, interpret taste)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(tastebud, interpret taste)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(tastebud, interpret taste)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(taste bud, like different tastes)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(tastebud, interpret taste)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(taste bud, like tastes)