tax: be higher than south

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents policy
Weight: 0.63
, fee
Weight: 0.61
, benefit
Weight: 0.61
, cost
Weight: 0.59
Siblings income tax
Weight: 0.75
, surcharge
Weight: 0.66
, income
Weight: 0.64
, rate
Weight: 0.62
, inheritance
Weight: 0.59

Related properties

Property Similarity
be higher than south 1.00
be higher in north 0.97
is higher 0.89
be high for lower class people 0.80
more than nsmbu 0.80
be much higher than investment tax 0.79
be much higher than sales tax 0.78
be higher than usa 0.77
be taxed at lower rate 0.76
be faster in state 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(cost, be higher than usa)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(tax, be higher than south)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(cost, more than nsmbu)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(tax, be higher than south)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(tax, be higher than south)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(cost, more than nsmbu)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(tax, be higher than south)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(cost, be higher than usa)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(tax, be higher than south)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(cost, be higher than usa)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(tax, be higher than south)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(cost, more than nsmbu)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(tax, be higher than south)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(income, be taxed at lower rate)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(tax, be higher than south)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be much higher than investment tax)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(tax, be higher than south)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be much higher than sales tax)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(cost, more than nsmbu)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(tax, be higher than south)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(tax, be higher than south)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(cost, be higher than usa)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(tax, be higher than south)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(tax, be higher than south)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(tax, be higher than south)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(income tax, be much higher than investment tax)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(income tax, be much higher than investment tax)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(tax, be higher than south)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(income tax, be much higher than sales tax)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(income tax, be much higher than sales tax)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(tax, be higher than south)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(income, be taxed at lower rate)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(income, be taxed at lower rate)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(tax, be higher than south)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(tax, be higher than south)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(tax, be higher than south)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(tax, be higher in north)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(tax, be higher than south)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(tax, be higher in north)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(tax, be higher than south)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(tax, be higher in north)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(tax, be higher than south)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(tax, be high for lower class people)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(tax, be higher than south)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(tax, is higher)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(tax, be higher than south)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(tax, be higher in north)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(tax, be higher than south)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(tax, is higher)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(tax, be higher than south)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(tax, be high for lower class people)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(tax, be higher than south)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(tax, is higher)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(tax, be higher than south)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(tax, is higher)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(tax, be higher than south)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(tax, be high for lower class people)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(tax, be higher than south)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(tax, be high for lower class people)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(tax, be higher than south)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(tax, be higher than south)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(tax, be higher than south)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(tax, be higher than south)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(tax, be higher than south)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(tax, be higher than south)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(cost, more than nsmbu)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(tax, be higher than south)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(cost, be higher than usa)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(tax, be higher than south)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(income tax, be much higher than sales tax)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(tax, be higher than south)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(income tax, be much higher than investment tax)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(tax, be higher than south)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(income, be taxed at lower rate)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(tax, be higher than south)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(cost, more than nsmbu)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(tax, be higher than south)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(cost, be higher than usa)