tax: be in wisconsin

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents policy
Weight: 0.63
, fee
Weight: 0.61
, benefit
Weight: 0.61
, cost
Weight: 0.59
Siblings income tax
Weight: 0.75
, surcharge
Weight: 0.66
, income
Weight: 0.64
, rate
Weight: 0.62
, inheritance
Weight: 0.59

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in wisconsin 1.00
be in california 0.78
be high in germany 0.77
be important to barack obama 0.76
work in ontario 0.75
be in portland 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(tax, be in wisconsin)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(tax, be in wisconsin)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(tax, be in wisconsin)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(tax, be in california)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(tax, be in wisconsin)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(tax, be in california)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(tax, be in wisconsin)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(tax, be in california)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(tax, be in wisconsin)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(tax, be in california)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(tax, be in wisconsin)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(tax, be important to barack obama)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(tax, be in wisconsin)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(tax, be important to barack obama)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(tax, be in wisconsin)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(tax, be important to barack obama)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(tax, be in wisconsin)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(tax, be important to barack obama)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(tax, be in wisconsin)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(tax, be in wisconsin)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(tax, be in wisconsin)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(tax, be in wisconsin)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(tax, be in wisconsin)