tax: be significant issue for american people

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents policy
Weight: 0.63
, fee
Weight: 0.61
, benefit
Weight: 0.61
, cost
Weight: 0.59
Siblings income tax
Weight: 0.75
, surcharge
Weight: 0.66
, income
Weight: 0.64
, rate
Weight: 0.62
, inheritance
Weight: 0.59

Related properties

Property Similarity
be significant issue for american people 1.00
be important for country 0.79
be important for government 0.77
be important in government 0.76
were created in america 0.76
affect american dream 0.76
were ongoing source for american colonists 0.76
be vital for government of pakistan 0.76
be for mobile service high in america 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(policy, be important in government)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(tax, be significant issue for american people)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(fee, be for mobile service high in america)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(tax, be significant issue for american people)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(tax, be significant issue for american people)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(fee, be for mobile service high in america)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(tax, be significant issue for american people)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(policy, be important in government)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(tax, be significant issue for american people)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(fee, be for mobile service high in america)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(tax, be significant issue for american people)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(policy, be important in government)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(tax, be significant issue for american people)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be important for government)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(policy, be important in government)
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(tax, be significant issue for american people)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(tax, be significant issue for american people)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(fee, be for mobile service high in america)
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(tax, be significant issue for american people)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(tax, be significant issue for american people)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(tax, be significant issue for american people)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(income tax, be important for government)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(income tax, be important for government)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(tax, be significant issue for american people)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(tax, be significant issue for american people)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(tax, be significant issue for american people)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(tax, were ongoing source for american colonists)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(tax, be significant issue for american people)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(tax, were ongoing source for american colonists)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(tax, be significant issue for american people)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(tax, were ongoing source for american colonists)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(tax, be significant issue for american people)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(tax, were created in america)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(tax, be significant issue for american people)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(tax, were ongoing source for american colonists)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(tax, be significant issue for american people)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(tax, be vital for government of pakistan)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(tax, be significant issue for american people)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(tax, be vital for government of pakistan)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(tax, be significant issue for american people)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(tax, be vital for government of pakistan)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(tax, be significant issue for american people)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(tax, were created in america)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(tax, be significant issue for american people)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(tax, be vital for government of pakistan)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(tax, be significant issue for american people)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(tax, were created in america)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(tax, be significant issue for american people)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(tax, were created in america)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(tax, be significant issue for american people)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(tax, be significant issue for american people)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(tax, be significant issue for american people)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(tax, be significant issue for american people)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(tax, be significant issue for american people)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(tax, be significant issue for american people)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(policy, be important in government)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(tax, be significant issue for american people)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(fee, be for mobile service high in america)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(tax, be significant issue for american people)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(income tax, be important for government)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(tax, be significant issue for american people)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(policy, be important in government)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(tax, be significant issue for american people)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(fee, be for mobile service high in america)