tax: go up year

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents policy
Weight: 0.63
, fee
Weight: 0.61
, benefit
Weight: 0.61
, cost
Weight: 0.59
Siblings income tax
Weight: 0.75
, surcharge
Weight: 0.66
, income
Weight: 0.64
, rate
Weight: 0.62
, inheritance
Weight: 0.59

Related properties

Property Similarity
go up year 1.00
keep going up 0.85
vary from month to month 0.77
go look 0.76
go work 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(tax, go up year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(rate, keep going up)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(tax, go up year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(rate, keep going up) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(rate, keep going up)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(tax, go up year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(tax, go up year)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(tax, go up year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(tax, keep going up)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(tax, go up year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(tax, keep going up)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(tax, go up year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(tax, keep going up)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(tax, go up year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(tax, vary from month to month)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(tax, go up year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(tax, vary from month to month)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(tax, go up year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(tax, keep going up)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(tax, go up year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(tax, vary from month to month)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(tax, go up year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(tax, vary from month to month)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(tax, go up year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(tax, go up year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(tax, go up year)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(tax, go up year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(tax, go up year)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(tax, go up year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(rate, keep going up)