tax: need limited

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents policy
Weight: 0.63
, fee
Weight: 0.61
, benefit
Weight: 0.61
, cost
Weight: 0.59
Siblings income tax
Weight: 0.75
, surcharge
Weight: 0.66
, income
Weight: 0.64
, rate
Weight: 0.62
, inheritance
Weight: 0.59

Related properties

Property Similarity
need limited 1.00
apply to limited liability company 0.79
is needed 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(policy, is needed)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(tax, need limited)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(tax, need limited)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(policy, is needed)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(tax, need limited)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(policy, is needed)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(policy, is needed)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(tax, need limited)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(tax, need limited)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(tax, need limited)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(tax, need limited)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(tax, need limited)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(tax, is needed)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(tax, need limited)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(tax, is needed)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(tax, need limited)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(tax, is needed)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(tax, need limited)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(tax, is needed)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(tax, need limited)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(tax, need limited)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(tax, need limited)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(tax, need limited)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(tax, need limited)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(tax, need limited)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(policy, is needed)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(tax, need limited)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(policy, is needed)