taxonomy: be concerned to biology

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents discipline
Weight: 0.58
, field
Weight: 0.56
, information
Weight: 0.56
, topic
Weight: 0.56
, structure
Weight: 0.54
Siblings recursion
Weight: 0.32
, computer database
Weight: 0.32
, ontology
Weight: 0.32
, directory
Weight: 0.31
, indexing
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be concerned to biology 1.00
be important to biology 0.92
be important to communication about biology 0.88
be important for communication in biology 0.87
be important to conservation biology 0.86
be important branch of biology 0.85
make biology easier 0.82
be important to science 0.81
be important in microbiology 0.79
be said science 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(taxonomy, be concerned to biology)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(taxonomy, be concerned to biology)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(taxonomy, be concerned to biology)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(taxonomy, be important to communication about biology)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(taxonomy, be concerned to biology)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(taxonomy, be important to communication about biology)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(taxonomy, be concerned to biology)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(taxonomy, be important to biology)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(taxonomy, be concerned to biology)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(taxonomy, be important branch of biology)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(taxonomy, be concerned to biology)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(taxonomy, be important to communication about biology)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(taxonomy, be concerned to biology)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(taxonomy, be important to biology)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(taxonomy, be concerned to biology)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(taxonomy, be important for communication in biology)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(taxonomy, be concerned to biology)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(taxonomy, be important to biology)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(taxonomy, be concerned to biology)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(taxonomy, be said science)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(taxonomy, be concerned to biology)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(taxonomy, be important to communication about biology)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(taxonomy, be concerned to biology)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(taxonomy, be important to conservation biology)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(taxonomy, be concerned to biology)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(taxonomy, be important to biology)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(taxonomy, be concerned to biology)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(taxonomy, be important for communication in biology)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(taxonomy, be concerned to biology)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(taxonomy, make biology easier)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(taxonomy, be concerned to biology)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(taxonomy, be important branch of biology)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(taxonomy, be concerned to biology)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(taxonomy, be said science)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(taxonomy, be concerned to biology)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(taxonomy, be important to conservation biology)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(taxonomy, be concerned to biology)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(taxonomy, be important for communication in biology)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(taxonomy, be concerned to biology)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(taxonomy, make biology easier)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(taxonomy, be concerned to biology)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(taxonomy, be important to conservation biology)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(taxonomy, be concerned to biology)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(taxonomy, be important for communication in biology)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(taxonomy, be concerned to biology)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(taxonomy, make biology easier)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(taxonomy, be concerned to biology)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(taxonomy, be said science)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(taxonomy, be concerned to biology)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(taxonomy, be important to conservation biology)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(taxonomy, be concerned to biology)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(taxonomy, be important to science)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(taxonomy, be concerned to biology)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(taxonomy, be important in microbiology)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(taxonomy, be concerned to biology)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(taxonomy, be important in microbiology)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(taxonomy, be concerned to biology)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(taxonomy, make biology easier)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(taxonomy, be concerned to biology)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(taxonomy, be important to science)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(taxonomy, be concerned to biology)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(taxonomy, be important branch of biology)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(taxonomy, be concerned to biology)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(taxonomy, be important in microbiology)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(taxonomy, be concerned to biology)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(taxonomy, be important to science)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(taxonomy, be concerned to biology)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(taxonomy, be important to science)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(taxonomy, be concerned to biology)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(taxonomy, be important branch of biology)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(taxonomy, be concerned to biology)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(taxonomy, be important in microbiology)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(taxonomy, be concerned to biology)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(taxonomy, be said science)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(taxonomy, be concerned to biology)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(taxonomy, be concerned to biology)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(taxonomy, be concerned to biology)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(taxonomy, be concerned to biology)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(taxonomy, be concerned to biology)