taxonomy: be considered work

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents discipline
Weight: 0.58
, field
Weight: 0.56
, information
Weight: 0.56
, topic
Weight: 0.56
, structure
Weight: 0.54
Siblings recursion
Weight: 0.32
, computer database
Weight: 0.32
, ontology
Weight: 0.32
, directory
Weight: 0.31
, indexing
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered work 1.00
be considered work in progress 0.83
work 0.82
be considered push 0.81
be regarded as science 0.79
be considered vital 0.78
be organised 0.76
be levelled ploughing 0.76
be considered vital for business success 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(field, work)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(taxonomy, be considered work)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(field, be considered push)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(taxonomy, be considered work)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(field, be levelled ploughing)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(taxonomy, be considered work)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(discipline, work)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(taxonomy, be considered work)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(taxonomy, be considered work)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(discipline, work)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(taxonomy, be considered work)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(field, be considered push)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(taxonomy, be considered work)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(field, work)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(taxonomy, be considered work)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(field, be levelled ploughing)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(taxonomy, be considered work)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(field, be levelled ploughing)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(taxonomy, be considered work)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(field, work)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(taxonomy, be considered work)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(field, be considered push)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(taxonomy, be considered work)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(discipline, work)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(taxonomy, be considered work)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(recursion, work)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(taxonomy, be considered work)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(indexing, work)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(field, work)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(taxonomy, be considered work)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(taxonomy, be considered work)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(field, be considered push)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(taxonomy, be considered work)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(taxonomy, be considered work)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(discipline, work)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(taxonomy, be considered work)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(taxonomy, be considered work)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(field, be levelled ploughing)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(taxonomy, be considered work)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(taxonomy, be considered work)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(taxonomy, be considered work)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(indexing, work)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(indexing, work)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(taxonomy, be considered work)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(recursion, work)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(recursion, work)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(taxonomy, be considered work)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(taxonomy, be considered work)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(taxonomy, be considered work)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(taxonomy, work)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(taxonomy, be considered work)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(taxonomy, be considered work in progress)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(taxonomy, be considered work)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(taxonomy, work)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(taxonomy, be considered work)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(taxonomy, work)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(taxonomy, be considered work)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(taxonomy, be regarded as science)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(taxonomy, be considered work)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(taxonomy, be regarded as science)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(taxonomy, be considered work)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(taxonomy, work)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(taxonomy, be considered work)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(taxonomy, be regarded as science)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(taxonomy, be considered work)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(taxonomy, be regarded as science)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(taxonomy, be considered work)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(taxonomy, be considered work in progress)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(taxonomy, be considered work)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(taxonomy, be considered work in progress)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(taxonomy, be considered work)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(taxonomy, be considered work in progress)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(taxonomy, be considered work)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(taxonomy, be considered work)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(taxonomy, be considered work)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(taxonomy, be considered work)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(taxonomy, be considered work)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(taxonomy, be considered work)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(discipline, work)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(taxonomy, be considered work)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(field, be considered push)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(taxonomy, be considered work)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(field, work)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(taxonomy, be considered work)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(field, be levelled ploughing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(taxonomy, be considered work)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(indexing, work)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(taxonomy, be considered work)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(recursion, work)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(taxonomy, be considered work)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(discipline, work)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(taxonomy, be considered work)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(field, be considered push)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(taxonomy, be considered work)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(field, work)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(taxonomy, be considered work)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(field, be levelled ploughing)