taxonomy: be important branch of biology

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents discipline
Weight: 0.58
, field
Weight: 0.56
, information
Weight: 0.56
, topic
Weight: 0.56
, structure
Weight: 0.54
Siblings recursion
Weight: 0.32
, computer database
Weight: 0.32
, ontology
Weight: 0.32
, directory
Weight: 0.31
, indexing
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important branch of biology 1.00
be important to biology 0.90
be important for communication in biology 0.86
be important to communication about biology 0.85
be concerned to biology 0.85
be important to conservation biology 0.84
make biology easier 0.82
be important to science 0.80
be important in microbiology 0.79
is zoology 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(taxonomy, be important branch of biology)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(taxonomy, be important branch of biology)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(taxonomy, be important branch of biology)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(taxonomy, be important to biology)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(taxonomy, be important branch of biology)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(taxonomy, be concerned to biology)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(taxonomy, be important branch of biology)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(taxonomy, be important to communication about biology)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(taxonomy, be important branch of biology)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(taxonomy, be important for communication in biology)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(taxonomy, be important branch of biology)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(taxonomy, be important to biology)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(taxonomy, be important branch of biology)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(taxonomy, is zoology)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(taxonomy, be important branch of biology)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(taxonomy, be important to conservation biology)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(taxonomy, be important branch of biology)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(taxonomy, make biology easier)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(taxonomy, be important branch of biology)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(taxonomy, be important to biology)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(taxonomy, be important branch of biology)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(taxonomy, be important to communication about biology)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(taxonomy, be important branch of biology)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(taxonomy, is zoology)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(taxonomy, be important branch of biology)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(taxonomy, be important to communication about biology)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(taxonomy, be important branch of biology)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(taxonomy, be concerned to biology)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(taxonomy, be important branch of biology)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(taxonomy, be concerned to biology)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(taxonomy, be important branch of biology)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(taxonomy, be important to science)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(taxonomy, be important branch of biology)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(taxonomy, be important for communication in biology)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(taxonomy, be important branch of biology)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(taxonomy, be important for communication in biology)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(taxonomy, be important branch of biology)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(taxonomy, be important in microbiology)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(taxonomy, be important branch of biology)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(taxonomy, be important to conservation biology)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(taxonomy, be important branch of biology)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(taxonomy, make biology easier)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(taxonomy, be important branch of biology)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(taxonomy, is zoology)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(taxonomy, be important branch of biology)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(taxonomy, be important to conservation biology)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(taxonomy, be important branch of biology)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(taxonomy, make biology easier)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(taxonomy, be important branch of biology)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(taxonomy, be important to science)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(taxonomy, be important branch of biology)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(taxonomy, be important in microbiology)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(taxonomy, be important branch of biology)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(taxonomy, be important in microbiology)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(taxonomy, be important branch of biology)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(taxonomy, be important to science)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(taxonomy, be important branch of biology)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(taxonomy, be important to communication about biology)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(taxonomy, be important branch of biology)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(taxonomy, be important for communication in biology)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(taxonomy, be important branch of biology)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(taxonomy, be concerned to biology)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(taxonomy, be important branch of biology)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(taxonomy, be important to biology)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(taxonomy, be important branch of biology)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(taxonomy, be important in microbiology)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(taxonomy, be important branch of biology)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(taxonomy, make biology easier)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(taxonomy, be important branch of biology)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(taxonomy, be important to conservation biology)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(taxonomy, be important branch of biology)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(taxonomy, be important to science)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(taxonomy, be important branch of biology)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(taxonomy, is zoology)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(taxonomy, be important branch of biology)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(taxonomy, be important branch of biology)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(taxonomy, be important branch of biology)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(taxonomy, be important branch of biology)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(taxonomy, be important branch of biology)