taxonomy: be important in microbiology

Property	Similarity
be important in microbiology	1.00
be important to biology	0.84
be important for communication in biology	0.81
be important to communication about biology	0.80
be concerned to biology	0.79
be important to conservation biology	0.79
be important branch of biology	0.79
be important to science	0.79
is zoology	0.78
be important in genomics	0.77

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.74

Typical(taxonomy, be important in microbiology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.00

¬ Typical(taxonomy, is zoology)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(taxonomy, be important in microbiology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Plausible(taxonomy, is zoology)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.80

Salient(taxonomy, be important in microbiology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Salient(taxonomy, is zoology)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.80

Salient(taxonomy, be important in microbiology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Salient(taxonomy, be important to communication about biology)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.74

Typical(taxonomy, be important in microbiology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Typical(taxonomy, be important to biology)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.80

Salient(taxonomy, be important in microbiology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Salient(taxonomy, be important to biology)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.80

Salient(taxonomy, be important in microbiology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Salient(taxonomy, be concerned to biology)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.80

Salient(taxonomy, be important in microbiology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Salient(taxonomy, be important for communication in biology)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(taxonomy, be important in microbiology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Plausible(taxonomy, be important to biology)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.65

Remarkable(taxonomy, be important in microbiology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Remarkable(taxonomy, be important to communication about biology)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.74

Typical(taxonomy, be important in microbiology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(taxonomy, be concerned to biology)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(taxonomy, be important in microbiology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Plausible(taxonomy, be important to communication about biology)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.80

Salient(taxonomy, be important in microbiology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Salient(taxonomy, be important branch of biology)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(taxonomy, be important in microbiology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Plausible(taxonomy, be concerned to biology)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.65

Remarkable(taxonomy, be important in microbiology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Remarkable(taxonomy, be important branch of biology)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.74

Typical(taxonomy, be important in microbiology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(taxonomy, be important to communication about biology)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.74

Typical(taxonomy, be important in microbiology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Typical(taxonomy, be important to conservation biology)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.80

Salient(taxonomy, be important in microbiology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Salient(taxonomy, be important to conservation biology)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.80

Salient(taxonomy, be important in microbiology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Salient(taxonomy, be important to science)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.74

Typical(taxonomy, be important in microbiology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(taxonomy, be important to science)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.74

Typical(taxonomy, be important in microbiology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(taxonomy, be important for communication in biology)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(taxonomy, be important in microbiology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Plausible(taxonomy, be important for communication in biology)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.65

Remarkable(taxonomy, be important in microbiology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(taxonomy, be important for communication in biology)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(taxonomy, be important in microbiology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Plausible(taxonomy, be important to conservation biology)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(taxonomy, be important in microbiology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Plausible(taxonomy, be important to science)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.65

Remarkable(taxonomy, be important in microbiology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(taxonomy, be concerned to biology)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.74

Typical(taxonomy, be important in microbiology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(taxonomy, be important branch of biology)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(taxonomy, be important in microbiology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Plausible(taxonomy, be important branch of biology)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.65

Remarkable(taxonomy, be important in microbiology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(taxonomy, be important to biology)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.65

Remarkable(taxonomy, be important in microbiology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(taxonomy, be important to conservation biology)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.65

Remarkable(taxonomy, be important in microbiology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(taxonomy, be important to science)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.65

Remarkable(taxonomy, be important in microbiology) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Remarkable(taxonomy, is zoology)

Parents	discipline Weight: 0.58 , field Weight: 0.56 , information Weight: 0.56 , topic Weight: 0.56 , structure Weight: 0.54
Siblings	recursion Weight: 0.32 , computer database Weight: 0.32 , ontology Weight: 0.32 , directory Weight: 0.31 , indexing Weight: 0.31

taxonomy: be important in microbiology

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings