taxonomy: be important to biology

Property	Similarity
be important to biology	1.00
be important for communication in biology	0.93
be important to communication about biology	0.92
be concerned to biology	0.92
be important to conservation biology	0.91
be important branch of biology	0.90
make biology easier	0.89
be important to science	0.87
be important in microbiology	0.84
is science	0.83

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.85

Salient(taxonomy, be important to biology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Salient(taxonomy, be important to communication about biology)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.80

Remarkable(taxonomy, be important to biology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Remarkable(taxonomy, be important to communication about biology)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.85

Salient(taxonomy, be important to biology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Salient(taxonomy, be concerned to biology)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.80

Remarkable(taxonomy, be important to biology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Remarkable(taxonomy, be important branch of biology)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.85

Salient(taxonomy, be important to biology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Salient(taxonomy, be important for communication in biology)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.65

Typical(taxonomy, be important to biology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Typical(taxonomy, is science)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.80

Remarkable(taxonomy, be important to biology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(taxonomy, be important for communication in biology)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.80

Remarkable(taxonomy, be important to biology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(taxonomy, be concerned to biology)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.85

Salient(taxonomy, be important to biology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Salient(taxonomy, be important to conservation biology)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.85

Salient(taxonomy, be important to biology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Salient(taxonomy, be important branch of biology)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.85

Salient(taxonomy, be important to biology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Salient(taxonomy, make biology easier)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.80

Remarkable(taxonomy, be important to biology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(taxonomy, be important to conservation biology)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.85

Salient(taxonomy, be important to biology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Salient(taxonomy, is science)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.69

Plausible(taxonomy, be important to biology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Plausible(taxonomy, is science)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.85

Salient(taxonomy, be important to biology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Salient(taxonomy, be important to science)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.80

Remarkable(taxonomy, be important to biology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(taxonomy, make biology easier)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.69

Plausible(taxonomy, be important to biology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Plausible(taxonomy, be important to communication about biology)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.69

Plausible(taxonomy, be important to biology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Plausible(taxonomy, be concerned to biology)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.85

Salient(taxonomy, be important to biology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Salient(taxonomy, be important in microbiology)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.80

Remarkable(taxonomy, be important to biology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(taxonomy, be important to science)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.80

Remarkable(taxonomy, be important to biology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Remarkable(taxonomy, be important in microbiology)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.69

Plausible(taxonomy, be important to biology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Plausible(taxonomy, make biology easier)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.69

Plausible(taxonomy, be important to biology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Plausible(taxonomy, be important for communication in biology)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.65

Typical(taxonomy, be important to biology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(taxonomy, be concerned to biology)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.69

Plausible(taxonomy, be important to biology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Plausible(taxonomy, be important to conservation biology)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.65

Typical(taxonomy, be important to biology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Typical(taxonomy, make biology easier)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.65

Typical(taxonomy, be important to biology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(taxonomy, be important to communication about biology)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.65

Typical(taxonomy, be important to biology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Typical(taxonomy, be important to conservation biology)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.69

Plausible(taxonomy, be important to biology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Plausible(taxonomy, be important branch of biology)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.69

Plausible(taxonomy, be important to biology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Plausible(taxonomy, be important to science)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.80

Remarkable(taxonomy, be important to biology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(taxonomy, is science)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.65

Typical(taxonomy, be important to biology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(taxonomy, be important for communication in biology)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.65

Typical(taxonomy, be important to biology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(taxonomy, be important to science)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.69

Plausible(taxonomy, be important to biology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Plausible(taxonomy, be important in microbiology)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.65

Typical(taxonomy, be important to biology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(taxonomy, be important branch of biology)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.65

Typical(taxonomy, be important to biology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(taxonomy, be important in microbiology)

Parents	discipline Weight: 0.58 , field Weight: 0.56 , information Weight: 0.56 , topic Weight: 0.56 , structure Weight: 0.54
Siblings	recursion Weight: 0.32 , computer database Weight: 0.32 , ontology Weight: 0.32 , directory Weight: 0.31 , indexing Weight: 0.31

taxonomy: be important to biology

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible