taxonomy: be said inexact science

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents discipline
Weight: 0.58
, field
Weight: 0.56
, information
Weight: 0.56
, topic
Weight: 0.56
, structure
Weight: 0.54
Siblings recursion
Weight: 0.32
, computer database
Weight: 0.32
, ontology
Weight: 0.32
, directory
Weight: 0.31
, indexing
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be said inexact science 1.00
be said science 0.83
be important to science 0.81
is science 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(taxonomy, be said inexact science)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(taxonomy, be said inexact science)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(taxonomy, be said inexact science)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(taxonomy, is science)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(taxonomy, be said inexact science)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(taxonomy, is science)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(taxonomy, be said inexact science)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(taxonomy, be said science)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(taxonomy, be said inexact science)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(taxonomy, be said science)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(taxonomy, be said inexact science)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(taxonomy, is science)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(taxonomy, be said inexact science)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(taxonomy, be important to science)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(taxonomy, be said inexact science)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(taxonomy, be said science)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(taxonomy, be said inexact science)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(taxonomy, be important to science)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(taxonomy, be said inexact science)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(taxonomy, be important to science)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(taxonomy, be said inexact science)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(taxonomy, be said science)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(taxonomy, be said inexact science)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(taxonomy, be important to science)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(taxonomy, be said inexact science)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(taxonomy, is science)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(taxonomy, be said inexact science)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(taxonomy, be said inexact science)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(taxonomy, be said inexact science)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(taxonomy, be said inexact science)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(taxonomy, be said inexact science)