taxonomy: work in progress

Related concepts

Parents	discipline Weight: 0.58 , field Weight: 0.56 , information Weight: 0.56 , topic Weight: 0.56 , structure Weight: 0.54
Siblings	recursion Weight: 0.32 , computer database Weight: 0.32 , ontology Weight: 0.32 , directory Weight: 0.31 , indexing Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property	Similarity
work in progress	1.00
be considered work in progress	0.96
work	0.79
be necessary for success	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.57

Plausible(field, work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Typical(taxonomy, work in progress)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.49

Plausible(discipline, be necessary for success) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Typical(taxonomy, work in progress)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.24

Plausible(discipline, work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Typical(taxonomy, work in progress)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.44

Plausible(taxonomy, work in progress) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Plausible(discipline, work)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.44

Plausible(taxonomy, work in progress) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Plausible(discipline, be necessary for success)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.44

Plausible(taxonomy, work in progress) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Plausible(field, work)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.20

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(taxonomy, work in progress) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(field, work)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(taxonomy, work in progress) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(discipline, be necessary for success)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(taxonomy, work in progress) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(discipline, work)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(taxonomy, work in progress) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Remarkable(recursion, work)

0.02

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(taxonomy, work in progress) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Remarkable(indexing, work)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.57

Plausible(field, work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

Remarkable(taxonomy, work in progress) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Plausible(taxonomy, work in progress)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.24

Plausible(discipline, work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

Remarkable(taxonomy, work in progress) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Plausible(taxonomy, work in progress)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.49

Plausible(discipline, be necessary for success) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

Remarkable(taxonomy, work in progress) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Plausible(taxonomy, work in progress)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.44

Plausible(taxonomy, work in progress) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

Remarkable(indexing, work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Plausible(indexing, work)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.44

Plausible(taxonomy, work in progress) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

Remarkable(recursion, work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Plausible(recursion, work)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.44

Plausible(taxonomy, work in progress) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Salient(taxonomy, work in progress)

Similarity expansion

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.87

Remarkable(taxonomy, work in progress) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(taxonomy, be considered work in progress)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.30

Typical(taxonomy, work in progress) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Typical(taxonomy, work)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.65

Salient(taxonomy, work in progress) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Salient(taxonomy, be considered work in progress)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.44

Plausible(taxonomy, work in progress) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Plausible(taxonomy, work)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.87

Remarkable(taxonomy, work in progress) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(taxonomy, work)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.44

Plausible(taxonomy, work in progress) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Plausible(taxonomy, be considered work in progress)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.30

Typical(taxonomy, work in progress) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Typical(taxonomy, be considered work in progress)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.65

Salient(taxonomy, work in progress) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Salient(taxonomy, work)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.65

Salient(taxonomy, work in progress) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Typical(taxonomy, work in progress) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(taxonomy, work in progress)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.44

Plausible(taxonomy, work in progress) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Typical(taxonomy, work in progress)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(taxonomy, work in progress) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Typical(discipline, work)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(taxonomy, work in progress) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Typical(discipline, be necessary for success)

0.19

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(taxonomy, work in progress) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Typical(field, work)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(taxonomy, work in progress) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Typical(indexing, work)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(taxonomy, work in progress) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Typical(recursion, work)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.30

Typical(taxonomy, work in progress) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Typical(discipline, work)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.30

Typical(taxonomy, work in progress) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Typical(discipline, be necessary for success)

0.22

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.30

Typical(taxonomy, work in progress) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Typical(field, work)