tea: be best with hot water

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents crop
Weight: 0.64
, soft drink
Weight: 0.62
, dish
Weight: 0.61
, alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.61
Siblings high tea
Weight: 0.59
, frappe
Weight: 0.39
, coffee
Weight: 0.35
, drinking beer
Weight: 0.34
, fruit salad
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be best with hot water 1.00
be best with water 0.93
need hot water 0.92
have hot 0.89
is hot 0.89
be good in hot weather 0.85
be done quicker in hot water 0.84
be in hot weather 0.82
dissolve faster in hot water 0.82
be good for cold 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(tea, be best with hot water)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(coffee, is hot)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(tea, be best with hot water)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(coffee, is hot)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(coffee, is hot)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(tea, be best with hot water)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(tea, be best with hot water)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(tea, be best with hot water)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(tea, dissolve faster in hot water)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(tea, be best with hot water)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(tea, dissolve faster in hot water)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(tea, be best with hot water)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(tea, dissolve faster in hot water)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(tea, be best with hot water)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(tea, need hot water)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(tea, be best with hot water)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(tea, need hot water)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(tea, be best with hot water)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(tea, be best with water)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(tea, be best with hot water)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(tea, be best with water)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(tea, be best with hot water)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(tea, be best with water)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(tea, be best with hot water)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(tea, need hot water)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(tea, be best with hot water)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(tea, need hot water)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(tea, be best with hot water)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(tea, dissolve faster in hot water)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(tea, be best with hot water)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(tea, be best with water)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(tea, be best with hot water)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(tea, have hot)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(tea, be best with hot water)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(tea, is hot)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(tea, be best with hot water)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(tea, is hot)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(tea, be best with hot water)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(tea, have hot)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(tea, be best with hot water)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(tea, have hot)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(tea, be best with hot water)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(tea, have hot)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(tea, be best with hot water)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(tea, is hot)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(tea, be best with hot water)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(tea, is hot)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(tea, be best with hot water)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(tea, be best with hot water)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(tea, be best with hot water)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(tea, be best with hot water)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(tea, be best with hot water)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(tea, be best with hot water)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(coffee, is hot)