tea: be more expensive than coffee

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents crop
Weight: 0.64
, soft drink
Weight: 0.62
, dish
Weight: 0.61
, alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.61
Siblings high tea
Weight: 0.59
, frappe
Weight: 0.39
, coffee
Weight: 0.35
, drinking beer
Weight: 0.34
, fruit salad
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more expensive than coffee 1.00
be cheaper than coffee 0.96
be better than coffee 0.94
be healthier than coffee 0.89
stay longer than coffee 0.89
be hotter than coffee 0.89
seem hotter than coffee 0.88
lose heat quicker than coffee 0.86
be good alternative to coffee 0.86
was more common than coffee in boston 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(tea, be more expensive than coffee)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(tea, be more expensive than coffee)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(tea, be more expensive than coffee)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(tea, be cheaper than coffee)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(tea, be more expensive than coffee)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(tea, be cheaper than coffee)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(tea, be more expensive than coffee)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(tea, be hotter than coffee)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(tea, be more expensive than coffee)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(tea, be hotter than coffee)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(tea, be more expensive than coffee)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(tea, be cheaper than coffee)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(tea, be more expensive than coffee)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(tea, be hotter than coffee)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(tea, be more expensive than coffee)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(tea, be healthier than coffee)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(tea, be more expensive than coffee)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(tea, be healthier than coffee)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(tea, be more expensive than coffee)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(tea, be cheaper than coffee)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(tea, be more expensive than coffee)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(tea, be healthier than coffee)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(tea, be more expensive than coffee)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(tea, be better than coffee)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(tea, be more expensive than coffee)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(tea, be better than coffee)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(tea, be more expensive than coffee)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(tea, be better than coffee)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(tea, be more expensive than coffee)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(tea, be hotter than coffee)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(tea, be more expensive than coffee)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(tea, be better than coffee)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(tea, be more expensive than coffee)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(tea, be healthier than coffee)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(tea, be more expensive than coffee)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(tea, be good alternative to coffee)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(tea, be more expensive than coffee)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(tea, be good alternative to coffee)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(tea, be more expensive than coffee)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(tea, be good alternative to coffee)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(tea, be more expensive than coffee)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(tea, be good alternative to coffee)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(tea, be more expensive than coffee)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(tea, be more expensive than coffee)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(tea, be more expensive than coffee)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(tea, be more expensive than coffee)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(tea, be more expensive than coffee)