tea: have hot

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents crop
Weight: 0.64
, soft drink
Weight: 0.62
, dish
Weight: 0.61
, alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.61
Siblings high tea
Weight: 0.59
, frappe
Weight: 0.39
, coffee
Weight: 0.35
, drinking beer
Weight: 0.34
, fruit salad
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
have hot 1.00
is hot 0.97
need hot water 0.90
be best with hot water 0.89
be in hot weather 0.87
be good in hot weather 0.86
be done quicker in hot water 0.80
be good for cold 0.77
dissolve faster in hot water 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(tea, have hot)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(coffee, is hot)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(tea, have hot)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(coffee, is hot)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(coffee, is hot)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(tea, have hot)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(tea, have hot)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(tea, have hot)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(tea, need hot water)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(tea, have hot)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(tea, be best with hot water)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(tea, have hot)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(tea, need hot water)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(tea, have hot)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(tea, be best with hot water)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(tea, have hot)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(tea, be best with hot water)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(tea, have hot)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(tea, need hot water)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(tea, have hot)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(tea, is hot)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(tea, have hot)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(tea, is hot)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(tea, have hot)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(tea, need hot water)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(tea, have hot)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(tea, be best with hot water)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(tea, have hot)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(tea, dissolve faster in hot water)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(tea, have hot)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(tea, dissolve faster in hot water)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(tea, have hot)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(tea, dissolve faster in hot water)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(tea, have hot)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(tea, is hot)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(tea, have hot)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(tea, is hot)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(tea, have hot)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(tea, dissolve faster in hot water)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(tea, have hot)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(tea, have hot)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(tea, have hot)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(tea, have hot)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(tea, have hot)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(tea, have hot)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(coffee, is hot)