team: be better than purple

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents football team
Weight: 0.77
, baseball team
Weight: 0.66
, professional
Weight: 0.65
, squad
Weight: 0.62
Siblings basketball team
Weight: 0.79
, new jersey
Weight: 0.71
, staff
Weight: 0.70
, lacrosse
Weight: 0.68
, league
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than purple 1.00
has color red 0.79
has quality better 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(team, be better than purple)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(league, has quality better)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(team, be better than purple)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(league, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(league, has quality better)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(team, be better than purple)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(team, be better than purple)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(team, be better than purple)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(team, has color red)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(team, be better than purple)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(team, has quality better)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(team, be better than purple)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(team, has color red)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(team, be better than purple)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(team, has color red)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(team, be better than purple)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(team, has quality better)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(team, be better than purple)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(team, has quality better)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(team, be better than purple)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(team, has color red)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(team, be better than purple)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(team, has quality better)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(team, be better than purple)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(team, be better than purple)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(team, be better than purple)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(team, be better than purple)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(team, be better than purple)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(team, be better than purple)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(league, has quality better)