team: be important in business

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents football team
Weight: 0.77
, baseball team
Weight: 0.66
, professional
Weight: 0.65
, squad
Weight: 0.62
Siblings basketball team
Weight: 0.79
, new jersey
Weight: 0.71
, staff
Weight: 0.70
, lacrosse
Weight: 0.68
, league
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in business 1.00
stay in business 0.84
be important for organization 0.76
be vital to organization 0.75
be important to organization 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(team, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(staff, be important in business)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(team, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(staff, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(staff, be important in business)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(team, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(team, be important in business)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(team, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(team, stay in business)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(team, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(team, stay in business)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(team, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(team, stay in business)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(team, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(team, stay in business)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(team, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(team, be important for organization)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(team, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(team, be important for organization)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(team, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(team, be vital to organization)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(team, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(team, be important to organization)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(team, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(team, be vital to organization)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(team, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(team, be important to organization)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(team, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(team, be important to organization)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(team, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(team, be important to organization)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(team, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(team, be vital to organization)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(team, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(team, be important for organization)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(team, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(team, be vital to organization)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(team, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(team, be important for organization)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(team, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(team, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(team, be important in business)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(team, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(team, be important in business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(team, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(staff, be important in business)